A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Multi-center study of residual gastric volume and bowel preparation after the usage of 1L and 2L polyethylene glycol in Korea. | LitMetric

Multi-center study of residual gastric volume and bowel preparation after the usage of 1L and 2L polyethylene glycol in Korea.

Medicine (Baltimore)

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Published: September 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: In colonoscopy, good bowel preparation is an important factor in determining the quality of colonoscopy. However, an increase in residual gastric volume (RGV) can lead to a higher risk of aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the factors related to an increase in RGV with the usage of 1L polyethylene glycol (PEG).

Methods: We prospectively analyzed 268 patients who underwent both gastroscopy and colonoscopy at 2 hospitals from May to October 2021. Bowel preparation was performed using 1L in 127 patients (47.4%) and 2L PEG in 141 patients (52.6%). We investigated the time taken for bowel preparation solutions, the last water intake, total water intake, and RGV, and conducted a survey on taking compliance and satisfaction.

Results: The level of RGV was significantly increased in the 1L PEG group when compared to the 2L PEG group (1L, 52.26 ± 65.33 vs 2L, 23.55 ± 22.99; P < .001). There was no difference between the 2 groups in the degree of bowel preparation, but there were more bubbles formed in the 1L group (1L, 1.91 ± 2.74 vs 2L, 1.10 ± 2.02; P = .007). In the case of RGV ≥ 50 mL, in multivariate analysis, the risk was higher in water intake within 5 hours and the patients who think the dose is too high (all P < .05).

Conclusion: Therefore, since RGV is higher in 1L PEG than in 2L PEG, it is necessary to be careful not to take water for at least 5 hours before the test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9509098PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000030795DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bowel preparation
16
residual gastric
8
gastric volume
8
usage polyethylene
8
polyethylene glycol
8
water intake
8
peg group
8
multi-center study
4
study residual
4
bowel
4

Similar Publications