Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma.

Patients And Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup.

Results: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients.

Conclusion: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870220PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nivolumab
13
versus nivolumab
12
patients
12
stage iiib-d
12
ipilimumab versus
8
nivolumab patients
8
patients resected
8
resected stage
8
iiib-d stage
8
stage melanoma
8

Similar Publications

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes in patients with advanced malignant melanoma (MM). However, more than half of patients receiving anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody monotherapy still fail to respond, with response rates varying by race and melanoma subtype. Additionally, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain a major concern.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite durable benefits of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), early progressive disease (PD), defined as disease progression within 3 months, occurs, and its predictors remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors associated with early PD in patients with mRCC treated with this regimen.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database identified 193 patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV + ) shows high efficacy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), potentially increasing tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk.

Case Presentation: A 64-year-old man with mUC underwent surgery and adjuvant nivolumab after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five months post-surgery, EV +  was initiated for recurrence with distant metastasis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To critically review the emerging evidence from two randomised trials-KEYNOTE-689 and NIVOPOSTOP-on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibition in resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and to elucidate how these positive results may redefine the current and future treatment paradigms.

Methods: We conducted a narrative review comparing the design, patient populations, treatment protocols, and outcomes of KEYNOTE-689 and NIVOPOSTOP. Data sources included ClinicalTrials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess prognosis of ER-low expression and its dynamics in HER2- metastatic breast cancer (BC) and to compare sensitivity to nivolumab between ER-low and triple-negative (TN) BC.

Experimental Design: Two cohorts were analyzed: a multicenter cohort of 982 patients with HER2- metastatic BC, and one prospective cohort of 110 patients with ER<10%/HER2- metastatic BC enrolled in the TONIC trial (testing nivolumab). Endpoints were: overall survival (OS) and post-relapse survival (PRS) in the retrospective cohort; progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in the TONIC trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF