98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma.
Patients And Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup.
Results: At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients.
Conclusion: Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870220 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00533 | DOI Listing |
J Dermatol
September 2025
Department of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved outcomes in patients with advanced malignant melanoma (MM). However, more than half of patients receiving anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody monotherapy still fail to respond, with response rates varying by race and melanoma subtype. Additionally, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain a major concern.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-19-18, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8471, Japan.
Background: Despite durable benefits of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), early progressive disease (PD), defined as disease progression within 3 months, occurs, and its predictors remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors associated with early PD in patients with mRCC treated with this regimen.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database identified 193 patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab.
IJU Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Urology Kochi Medical School, Kochi University Nankoku Kochi Japan.
Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV + ) shows high efficacy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), potentially increasing tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk.
Case Presentation: A 64-year-old man with mUC underwent surgery and adjuvant nivolumab after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Five months post-surgery, EV + was initiated for recurrence with distant metastasis.
Cancer Treat Rev
August 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Fukui Hospital, Japan.
Aim: To critically review the emerging evidence from two randomised trials-KEYNOTE-689 and NIVOPOSTOP-on perioperative immune checkpoint inhibition in resectable, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and to elucidate how these positive results may redefine the current and future treatment paradigms.
Methods: We conducted a narrative review comparing the design, patient populations, treatment protocols, and outcomes of KEYNOTE-689 and NIVOPOSTOP. Data sources included ClinicalTrials.
Clin Cancer Res
September 2025
University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Purpose: To assess prognosis of ER-low expression and its dynamics in HER2- metastatic breast cancer (BC) and to compare sensitivity to nivolumab between ER-low and triple-negative (TN) BC.
Experimental Design: Two cohorts were analyzed: a multicenter cohort of 982 patients with HER2- metastatic BC, and one prospective cohort of 110 patients with ER<10%/HER2- metastatic BC enrolled in the TONIC trial (testing nivolumab). Endpoints were: overall survival (OS) and post-relapse survival (PRS) in the retrospective cohort; progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and clinical benefit rate (CBR) in the TONIC trial.