Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: This study aimed to construct a tumor microenvironment (TME)-related risk model to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with breast cancer.
Methods: Gene expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas was used as the training set. Differentially expressed gene analysis, prognosis analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression analysis, and Wald stepwise Cox regression were performed to screen for the TME-related risk model. Three Gene Expression Omnibus databases were used to validate the predictive efficiency of the prognostic model. The TME-risk-related biological function was investigated using the gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) method. Tumor immune and mutation signatures were analyzed between low- and high-TME-risk groups. The patients' response to chemotherapy and immunotherapy were evaluated by the tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score and immunophenscore (IPS).
Results: Five TME-related genes were screened for constructing a prognostic signature. Higher TME risk scores were significantly associated with worse clinical outcomes in the training set and the validation set. Correlation and stratification analyses also confirmed the predictive efficiency of the TME risk model in different subtypes and stages of breast cancer. Furthermore, immune checkpoint expression and immune cell infiltration were found to be upregulated in the low-TME-risk group. Biological processes related to immune response functions were proved to be enriched in the low-TME-risk group through GSEA analysis. Tumor mutation analysis and TIDE and IPS analyses showed that the high-TME-risk group had more tumor mutation burden and responded better to immunotherapy.
Conclusion: The novel and robust TME-related risk model had a strong implication for breast cancer patients in OS, immune response, and therapeutic efficiency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433750 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.927565 | DOI Listing |