A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Evaluation of computed tomography dose profiler probe for computed tomography dose index and geometric efficiency measurements. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of solid-state sensor based computed tomography dose profiler (CTDP) probe for measurement of standard computed tomography dose metric CTDIand free in air geometric efficiency for various beam widths available in a 128-slice CT scanner and also to estimate the efficiency of CTDImetric. The response accuracy of CTDP probe was verified using a standard 100 mm long ionization chamber. The geometric efficiency measurements performed by the CTDP probe were validated using XR-QA2 radiochromic film measurements. The efficiency of CTDImetric was assessed by calculating the ratio of CTDImeasured in the center hole position to CTDImeasured in the same position of both head and body phantoms. The weighted CTDI values derived from CTDImeasured by the CTDP probe showed an average difference of 8% from ionization chamber measured values. The efficiency of CTDImetric estimated using CTDP probe and 150 mm long phantoms was in the range of 82% to 86% and 76% to 80% for head and body phantom measurements respectively. The differences in the geometric efficiency values for various beam settings and tube voltages measured by the CTDP probe and films were within 7%. Taken together, the results of this study proved that unlike the 100 mm long ionization chamber, the CTDP probe can be efficiently used to determine CTDI for any length over which dose integration is desired and also measure geometric efficiency of MDCT scanners for various beam widths in helical mode of operation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ac8e71DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ctdp probe
28
geometric efficiency
20
computed tomography
16
tomography dose
16
efficiency ctdimetric
12
ionization chamber
12
dose profiler
8
probe
8
efficiency
8
efficiency measurements
8

Similar Publications