A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Postoperative Immobilization After Hip Reconstruction in Cerebral Palsy: No Difference Between Hip Spica and Abduction Pillow. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare radiographic outcomes and complication rates of immobilization with an abduction pillow to spica casting for postoperative care after a hip reconstruction with varus derotational proximal femur osteotomy (VDRO) with or without pelvic osteotomy for children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods: 233 children (1-18 years old) diagnosed with CP that underwent VDRO with or without pelvic osteotomy were identified, of which 188 patients were immobilized with a spica cast and 45 were immobilized with an abduction pillow, based on surgeon preference. 123 (65%) in the Spica group and 21 (47%) in the pillow group had pelvic osteotomies. Demographic data and complication rates were collected. Radiographic parameters, including anatomic medial proximal femoral angle (aMPFA), acetabular index (AI) and migration percentage (MP), were measured for each patient at the completion of surgery, six weeks post-operatively, and one year post-operatively.

Results: There was not a statistically significant difference in BMI ( = 0.285), gender distribution ( = 0.984), or median follow-up time ( = 0.314) between groups. Rates of complications were consistent among groups with no differences in instances of delayed unions ( = 0.10), subluxations ( = 0.55), infection ( = 0.71), or non-unions ( = 0.10). There was no statistically significant difference in number of patients with an ideal aMPFA, AI, or MP ( = 0.44,  = 0.19,  = 1.00) at one year post-operatively.

Conclusions: Immobilization with an abduction pillow is a safe and effective alternative to hip spica casting following hip reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407031PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.863287DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abduction pillow
16
hip reconstruction
12
cerebral palsy
8
hip spica
8
complication rates
8
immobilization abduction
8
spica casting
8
vdro pelvic
8
pelvic osteotomy
8
statistically difference
8

Similar Publications