A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Automated segmentation of colorectal liver metastasis and liver ablation on contrast-enhanced CT images. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most common cancer in the USA, is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Up to 60% of patients develop liver metastasis (CRLM). Treatments like radiation and ablation therapies require disease segmentation for planning and therapy delivery. For ablation, ablation-zone segmentation is required to evaluate disease coverage. We hypothesize that fully convolutional (FC) neural networks, trained using novel methods, will provide rapid and accurate identification and segmentation of CRLM and ablation zones.

Methods: Four FC model styles were investigated: Standard 3D-UNet, Residual 3D-UNet, Dense 3D-UNet, and Hybrid-WNet. Models were trained on 92 patients from the liver tumor segmentation (LiTS) challenge. For the evaluation, we acquired 15 patients from the 3D-IRCADb database, 18 patients from our institution (CRLM = 24, ablation-zone = 19), and those submitted to the LiTS challenge ( = 70). Qualitative evaluations of our institutional data were performed by two board-certified radiologists (interventional and diagnostic) and a radiology-trained physician fellow, using a Likert scale of 1-5.

Results: The most accurate model was the Hybrid-WNet. On a patient-by-patient basis in the 3D-IRCADb dataset, the median (min-max) Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was 0.73 (0.41-0.88), the median surface distance was 1.75 mm (0.57-7.63 mm), and the number of false positives was 1 (0-4). In the LiTS challenge ( = 70), the global DSC was 0.810. The model sensitivity was 98% (47/48) for sites ≥15 mm in diameter. Qualitatively, 100% (24/24; minority vote) of the CRLM and 84% (16/19; majority vote) of the ablation zones had Likert scores ≥4.

Conclusion: The Hybrid-WNet model provided fast (<30 s) and accurate segmentations of CRLM and ablation zones on contrast-enhanced CT scans, with positive physician reviews.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9403767PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.886517DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lits challenge
12
liver metastasis
8
ablation
5
automated segmentation
4
segmentation colorectal
4
liver
4
colorectal liver
4
metastasis liver
4
liver ablation
4
ablation contrast-enhanced
4

Similar Publications