98%
921
2 minutes
20
To evaluate the correlation of the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss with the recurrence dislocation rate and the Rowe score. Retrospective study that assessed the glenoid track and glenoidal bone loss through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients undergoing primary arthroscopic repair of anterior Bankart were included. Patients with glenoidal bone loss greater than 21%, rotator cuff tear, scapular waist fracture, and posterior or multidirectional instability were not included. Rowe score were the primary outcome, and the recurrence rate was the secondary outcome. One hundred and two patients were included. Postoperative recurrent instability was reported by 8 patients (7.8%). Four patients (50%) in the group with recurrence presented glenoidal bone loss greater than 13.5% against 24 (25.5%) in the group without recurrence ( = 0.210), with a negative predictive value of 94.6%. Three patients (37.5%) in the recurrence group were considered off-track, against 13 (13.8%) in the group without recurrence ( = 0.109), with a negative predictive value of 94.2%. Patients with absolute glenoid track value ≤ 1.5 mm had worse results in relation to the recurrence group, with 6 patients (75%) presenting recurrence ( = 0.003). Off-track injury and glenoidal bone loss greater than the subcritical are not related to the recurrence rate and Rowe score, despite the high negative predictive value. The cut of the absolute value of the glenoid track at 1.5 mm had a significant relationship with the recurrence rate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365485 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1741022 | DOI Listing |
Arthroscopy
September 2025
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery. Electronic address:
Recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss is a difficult problem with several surgical options. The Latarjet technique remains the gold standard for glenoid bone reconstruction in the setting of critical glenoid bone loss with excellent long-term outcomes. However, this technique has well known downsides including high rates of complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
September 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:
Background: Management of a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in young and active patients remains a topic of ongoing debate. This study aims to use choice-based conjoint analysis to identify the factors influencing a surgeon's decision-making process and explore potential heterogeneity in the identified decision patterns.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment was conducted among all 94 members of the Belgian Elbow and Shoulder Society.
Arthroscopy
July 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hoag Orthopedic Institute, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
Purpose: To evaluate and qualitatively synthesize studies performed in the past decade that report return to sport (RTS) after anterior shoulder instability surgery and identify study, patient, and surgical characteristics that reduce heterogeneity in RTS outcomes, to help guide surgeons and patients in collaborative decision-making and set appropriate expectations of postoperative athletic performance.
Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted for all studies published between January 2015 and March 2025 reporting RTS or return to preinjury level (RTPL) following surgical treatment for anterior shoulder instability. Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, studies reporting less than a 2-year follow-up, and studies reporting any shoulder instability other than anterior, including atraumatic instability.
Healthcare (Basel)
July 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tanta University School of Medicine, Tanta 31527, Egypt.
Recurrent anterior shoulder instability is a common problem and may be associated with glenoid bone defects. Surgical procedures, including Latarjet, are the usual treatment for anterior shoulder instability, associated with significant glenoid bone defects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome and glenohumeral arthritis progression in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and significant bone loss treated by a modified Latarjet procedure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthop J Sports Med
July 2025
Duke University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Background: Accurate assessment of glenoid bone loss and morphological variations is crucial for determining optimal surgical care pathways for shoulder instability. While 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) has been the gold standard for evaluating static bone quality, 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently been proven reliable for these static assessments but remains unvalidated for dynamic, advanced morphological variables.
Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of 3D MRI and 3D CT in measuring advanced, dynamic morphological variables in glenohumeral instability.