Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

The goal of the study was to determine the differences between volitional and maximal movement tempo during resistance exercise. Ten healthy men volunteered for the study (age = 26.4 ± 4.8 years; body mass = 93.8 ± 9.6 kg; barbell squat one-repetition maximum (1RM) = 175 ± 16.7 kg; bench press 1RM = 140.5 ± 26.8 kg). In a randomized order, the participants performed six sets of the barbell squat and the bench press exercise at progressive loads from 40% to 90%1RM (step by 10%) under two testing conditions: with volitional movement tempo or with maximal movement tempo. The three-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant multi-interaction effect for time under tension (p < 0.001), peak bar velocity (p = 0.04) and for mean bar velocity (p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant main effect of movement tempo for time under tension (p < 0.001), peak bar velocity (p < 0.001) and for mean bar velocity (p < 0.001). The post hoc analysis for main effect of tempo revealed that time under tension was significantly longer for volitional compared to maximal tempo (0.84 vs 0.67 s, respectively), peak bar velocity was significantly higher for maximal compared to volitional tempo (1.24 m/s vs 0.90 m/s, respectively), and mean bar velocity was significant higher for maximal compared to volitional tempo (0.84 m/s vs 0.67 m/s, respectively). The presented results indicate that there were significant differences between volitional and maximal movement tempos in time under tension and bar velocity (peak and mean), as well as significant differences in those variables between the two exercises. Therefore, the velocity of movement and time under tension is related to movement tempo, external load and type of exercise used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331330PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2022.106160DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bar velocity
32
movement tempo
24
time tension
24
maximal movement
12
peak bar
12
velocity 0001
12
tempo
10
velocity
9
bar
8
differences volitional
8

Similar Publications

Insights into Fouling Control of the Salt-Responsive Membrane across the Entire Filtration-Backwashing Cycle.

Environ Sci Technol

August 2025

State Key Laboratory of Urban-rural Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, PR China.

Ultrafiltration, a key membrane technology for surface water treatment, is highly susceptible to fouling caused by natural organic matter. Herein, a zwitterionic polymeric membrane () was fabricated via a two-step protocol. During surface water filtration, demonstrated high pure water permeance (about 1433 L·m·h·bar) and superior fouling-resistant ability compared with the commercial ultrafiltration membrane.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The main aim of this study deals with the potential evaluation of a fluidized bed membrane reactor (FBMR) for hydrogen production as a clean fuel carrier via methanol steam reforming reaction, comparing its performance with other reactors including packed bed membrane reactors (PBMR), fluidized bed reactors (FBR), and packed bed reactors (PBR). For this purpose, a two-dimensional, axisymmetric numerical model was developed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the reactor performances. Model accuracy was validated by comparing the simulation results for PBMR and PB with experimental data, showing an accurate agreement within them.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From Visualization to Mechanism: Uncovering Early Fouling Dynamics in Nanofiltration through LIF Experiments.

Environ Sci Technol

September 2025

Environmental Engineering Research Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR 999077, P. R. China.

Early fouling in nanofiltration membranes critically impacts long-term performance and operational efficiency, yet its dynamic evolution remains poorly understood due to limitations in real-time characterization. This study employs laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) technology to visualize and quantify the spatiotemporal development of early fouling during the initial 120 min of filtration. Combined with discrete phase model (DPM) simulations, the work reveals how cross-flow velocity and transmembrane pressure modulate early fouling behavior.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study presents a hybrid modeling framework for predicting proppant settling rate (PSR) in hydraulic fracturing by integrating symbolic physics-based derivations, parametric simulations, and ensemble machine learning. Symbolic expressions were formulated using Stokes' law, drag equations, and pressure-gradient dynamics. A symbolic dataset was synthetically generated by sampling realistic physical ranges: proppant density [Formula: see text], fluid viscosity [Formula: see text], and particle diameter [Formula: see text].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To explore the relationship between bar velocity and perceived repetitions in reserve (pRIR) for the bench press and the squat exercises during multiple training sessions in strength-trained individuals.

Methods: Nineteen well-trained individuals (9♀ and 10♂, 26 ± 4 yr, 174 ± 8 cm, 74 ± 9 kg (mean ± standard deviation)) trained squats and bench press for six weeks. Within each week, they conducted three sessions with different loads, corresponding to ∼77-79%, ∼82-84%, and ∼87-89% of one repetition maximum (1RM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF