A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

A Rare Case of Co-Existing Mucin-Producing Urothelial-Type Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate and Acinar Adenocarcinoma. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate is an extremely rare neoplasm, and its coexistence with acinar adenocarcinoma is exceptional. A 70-year-old man presented with treatment resistant symptoms of urinary obstruction. The serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was normal. Cystoscopy revealed a kind of "cottony fluff" in the prostatic urethra. A computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a polylobulated, hyperintense lesion with mucinous content. It was located in the right lobe of the prostate and measured 35 × 27 × 35 mm. The bladder cavity did not show lesions and the gastrointestinal endoscopy was normal. Thus, the patient underwent a radical cystoprostatectomy. The histological sections showed the characteristics of a mucin-producing adenocarcinoma with extensive areas of mucin pools formation. No areas of necrosis, glandular urethritis, or carcinoma in situ were identified. Neither lymphovascular and perineural invasion nor lymph node metastases were identified. The immunohistochemical study showed diffuse positivity for keratin (KRT) 7, KRT20, and membranous beta-catenin and focal positivity for KRT34betaE12 and caudal-related homeobox gene 2 (CDX2). In addition, we identified a 10-mm focus of prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma that was positive for racemase and NKX3.1. There is no treatment algorithm for this condition; however, surgery (radical prostatectomy) with or without adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment represents a therapeutic alternative.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10668969221105624DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acinar adenocarcinoma
12
mucin-producing urothelial-type
8
urothelial-type adenocarcinoma
8
adenocarcinoma prostate
8
adenocarcinoma
6
rare case
4
case co-existing
4
co-existing mucin-producing
4
prostate
4
prostate acinar
4

Similar Publications