A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Are there differences between monochorionic twin placentas after spontaneous and assisted conception? | LitMetric

Are there differences between monochorionic twin placentas after spontaneous and assisted conception?

Placenta

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:

Published: August 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: No data are available on the placental characteristics of monochorionic twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF). This study investigates the differences between placentas from monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously and those conceived after IVF.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of placental data from a consecutive series of MCDA twin pregnancies followed from the first trimester. The following placental characteristics were compared between IVF versus spontaneous MCDA pregnancies: placental sharing and birth weight discordance relative to placental sharing, the placental angioarchitecture (number, type, and size of anastomoses), and the umbilical cord insertion types.

Results: Of the 256 MCDA placentas included in this analysis, 32 (12%) were conceived through IVF and 224 (88%) spontaneously. MCDA twin placentas after IVF did not differ significantly from MCDA twin placentas after spontaneous conception regarding placental sharing, birthweight discordance relative to sharing discordance, and angioarchitecture. There was a trend toward more discordant cord insertions (combination eccentric and velamentous) in IVF (25%) than in spontaneously conceived placentas (12%) (P = 0.05).

Discussion: No differences could be demonstrated between MCDA placentation after spontaneous conception and IVF. Any differences in pregnancy outcome between spontaneous and IVF conceived MCDA twins may not be related to differences in placental sharing, angioarchitecture and cord insertion type.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2022.07.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcda twin
16
placental sharing
16
twin placentas
12
twin pregnancies
12
monochorionic twin
8
placentas spontaneous
8
placental
8
placental characteristics
8
pregnancies conceived
8
mcda
8

Similar Publications