A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Atomoxetine and fesoterodine combination improves obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients with milder upper airway collapsibility. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Objective: The combination of the noradrenergic atomoxetine plus the anti-muscarinic oxybutynin acutely increased genioglossus activity and reduced obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity. However, oxybutynin has shorter half-life than atomoxetine and side effects that might discourage long-term usage. Accordingly, we aimed to test the combination of atomoxetine and fesoterodine (Ato-Feso), a newer anti-muscarinic with extended release formulation, on OSA severity and endotypes.

Methods: Twelve subjects with OSA underwent a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial comparing one night of atomoxetine plus fesoterodine (80-4 mg) to placebo. Parameters of OSA severity (e.g., apnoea-hypopnoea index [AHI], nadir oxygen desaturation and hypoxic burden) were calculated from two clinical, in-lab polysomnographic studies. OSA endotypes (including collapsibility per V and arousal threshold) were derived from validated algorithms.

Results: Compared to placebo, Ato-Feso did not reduce the AHI (34.2 ± 19.1 vs. 30.1 ± 28.2 events/h, p = 0.493), but reduced the apnoea index (12.9 [28.8] vs. 1.8 [9.1] events/h, median [interquartile range], p = 0.027) and increased nadir desaturation (76.8 [8.0] vs. 82.2 [8.8] %, p = 0.003); a non-significant trend for improved hypoxic burden was observed (52.4 [50.5] vs. 29.7 [78.9] %min/h, p = 0.093). Ato-Feso lowered collapsibility (raised V ; 43.7 [29.8-55.7] vs. 56.8 [43.8-69.8] %V , mean [CI], p = 0.002), but reduced the arousal threshold (129.3 [120.1-138.6] vs. 116.7 [107.5-126] %V , p = 0.038). In post hoc analysis, 6/6 patients with milder collapsibility (V  > 43%) exhibited OSA resolution (drop in AHI > 50% and residual AHI < 10 events/h) and improved hypoxaemia.

Conclusion: While inefficacious in unselected patients, Ato-Feso administered for one night suppressed OSA in patients with milder collapsibility. Ato-Feso may hold some promise as an alternative OSA treatment in certain subgroups of individuals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10041976PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.14326DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atomoxetine fesoterodine
12
osa severity
12
obstructive sleep
8
sleep apnoea
8
patients milder
8
hypoxic burden
8
arousal threshold
8
osa
6
atomoxetine
5
fesoterodine combination
4

Similar Publications