98%
921
2 minutes
20
This research aimed to present a novel glasses-free distance random-dot stereotest system (GFDRDSS) using an eye-tracking method. A single-view autostereoscopic display applying a backlight control system combined with an eye-tracking method and the corresponding random-dot stereotest software were developed to create a GFDRDSS with a viewing distance of 5 m. The stereoacuity of 12 subjects with normal eye position was evaluated using the Randot Stereotest, Stereoscopic Test Charts vol. 3 (Yan's Charts), Distance Randot Stereotest, and GFDRDSS. The GFDRDSS could provide distinct and stable glasses-free stereoscopic perception even while the subject was moving their head. It could evaluate binocular disparities of 40-2,400 arcsec. Eleven subjects with normal near visual acuity had fine near stereovision (20-60 arcsec) using the Randot stereotest and Yan's Charts. Under refractive correction, 10 subjects had fine stereovision (≤60 arcsec) using the GFDRDSS at a distance of 5 m, and 9 had fine stereovision using the Distance Randot Stereotest at 3 m. Other subjects described the 100 arcsec-level stereograms correctly. The results exhibited a concordance of stereoacuity within one degrade between the two distance stereotests. The proposed GFDRDSS can alternately project a couple of random-dot stereograms to the subjects' eyes and provide a glasses-free distance stereotest, which showed good concordance with the Distance Randot Stereotest. More data are needed for statistical studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9251353 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.799744 | DOI Listing |
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
August 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.
Purpose: Stereopsis, a critical aspect of binocular vision, can be influenced by refractive errors. This study investigated how experimentally induced anisometropia affected distance stereopsis in adults and aimed to determine threshold levels for different types and amounts of experimentally induced anisometropia.
Methods: Twenty healthy adults (aged 20-45 years) with normal visual acuity and baseline distance stereopsis were included.
J Multidiscip Healthc
March 2025
Senior Department of Ophthalmology, The Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100089, People's Republic of China.
Objective: This study assessed the sensitivity, validity, reliability, and monocular cue masking of a novel glasses-free distance random-dot stereotest system (GFDRDSS) compared with the established Distance Randot stereotest in youth with normal vision.
Methods: A total of 185 participants (17-20 years) with normal uncorrected visual acuity and eye alignment were enrolled. Distance stereoacuity was measured by GFDRDSS at 5 m and Distance Randot at 3 m.
Mater Sociomed
January 2025
Eye Clinic "Svjetlost", Zagreb, Medical School University of Rijeka, Croatia.
Background: Falls impose a heavy financial burden on society, and the incidence is age-related. The correction of refractive errors has been mooted as a valuable procedure to prevent falls. However, depth perception, estimated by stereo acuity tests, is reduced in the older population and has been cited as contributing to the higher incidence of falls in the elderly.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Ophthalmol
August 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Başkent University School of Medicine, Fevzi Çakmak Blv. Bahçelievler, 06490, Ankara, Turkey.
Purpose: We aimed to evaluate distance stereoacuity (DS) in patients with successfully treated accommodative esotropia (AET) and its association with other clinical factors.
Methods: The medical records of 176 children with refractive AET with a follow-up period ≥ 1 year were reviewed to identify a cohort of patients who achieved a stable alignment within 4 prism diopters (PD) of orthotropia at both distance and near fixation. Age of onset, duration of misalignment, uncorrected near and distance deviation, accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio, refractive error, presence of anisometropia and amblyopia, near stereopsis were evaluated as predictors of outcome.
PLoS One
June 2024
Department of Psychology, College of Science, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Purpose: Stereopsis is a critical visual function, however clinical stereotests are time-consuming, coarse in resolution, suffer memorization artifacts, poor repeatability, and low agreement with other tests. Foraging Interactive D-prime (FInD) Stereo and Angular Indication Measurement (AIM) Stereo were designed to address these problems. Here, their performance was compared with 2-Alternative-Forced-Choice (2-AFC) paradigms (FInD Stereo only) and clinical tests (Titmus and Randot) in 40 normally-sighted and 5 binocularly impaired participants (FInD Stereo only).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF