98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Multiple long-term health conditions (multimorbidity) (MLTC-M) are increasingly prevalent and associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditure. Strategies to address this have primarily focused on the biological aspects of disease, but MLTC-M also result from and are associated with additional psychosocial, economic, and environmental barriers. A shift toward more personalized, holistic, and integrated care could be effective. This could be made more efficient by identifying groups of populations based on their health and social needs. In turn, these will contribute to evidence-based solutions supporting delivery of interventions tailored to address the needs pertinent to each cluster. Evidence is needed on how to generate clusters based on health and social needs and quantify the impact of clusters on long-term health and costs.
Objective: We intend to develop and validate population clusters that consider determinants of health and social care needs for people with MLTC-M using data-driven machine learning (ML) methods compared to expert-driven approaches within primary care national databases, followed by evaluation of cluster trajectories and their association with health outcomes and costs.
Methods: The mixed methods program of work with parallel work streams include the following: (1) qualitative semistructured interview studies exploring patient, caregiver, and professional views on clinical and socioeconomic factors influencing experiences of living with or seeking care in MLTC-M; (2) modified Delphi with relevant stakeholders to generate variables on health and social (wider) determinants and to examine the feasibility of including these variables within existing primary care databases; and (3) cohort study with expert-driven segmentation, alongside data-driven algorithms. Outputs will be compared, clusters characterized, and trajectories over time examined to quantify associations with mortality, additional long-term conditions, worsening frailty, disease severity, and 10-year health and social care costs.
Results: The study will commence in October 2021 and is expected to be completed by October 2023.
Conclusions: By studying MLTC-M clusters, we will assess how more personalized care can be developed, how accurate costs can be provided, and how to better understand the personal and medical profiles and environment of individuals within each cluster. Integrated care that considers "whole persons" and their environment is essential in addressing the complex, diverse, and individual needs of people living with MLTC-M.
International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/34405.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9247810 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34405 | DOI Listing |
J Adv Nurs
September 2025
Department of Sociology and Behavioral Sciences, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines.
Aim: To explore the potential axiological shift in nursing, drawing upon a critical reading of the new definition of 'nursing' published by the International Council of Nurses (ICN) in June 2025, and to articulate its implications for research and doctoral education.
Design: Critical discussion paper.
Methods: Guided by critical inquiry and emancipatory nursing knowledge development approaches, this paper deploys retroductive analysis to interrogate the axiological commitments that inform and are generated by the 2025 ICN definition and how it relates to nursing research.
Emerg Med Australas
October 2025
Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Reliably defining the risk of adverse in-flight events in aeromedical trauma patients could enable more informed pre-departure treatment and guide central asset allocation to achieve better system-level outcomes. Unfortunately, the current literature base specifically examining the in-flight period is sparse. Flight duration is often considered a proxy for the risk of in-flight deterioration; however, there is limited data to support this commonly held assumption.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Commun
September 2025
Department of Graduate Studies, Wenzhou Medical University.
This systematic review examines how wellness misinformation spreads on social media and identifies counter-strategies through the lens of social cognitive theory (SCT). Analyzing 39 studies from 2019-2024, it highlights key SCT themes - observational learning, self-efficacy, and self-regulation - as central to user behavior. Influencers and algorithm-driven content amplify unverified health claims, especially on platforms like TikTok and Twitter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Paediatr Child Health
September 2025
Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Aim: To measure the prevalence of BF amongst Brazilian children aged 12-24 months, assess associated social determinants and evaluate the impact of maternal knowledge about its benefits.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between September and December 2024, using an online questionnaire completed by Brazilian mothers with children aged 12-24 months. Sociodemographic data were collected, including maternal and child age, education level, marital status, ethnicity, household income and employment status.
Child Care Health Dev
September 2025
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Objective: To describe the self-report instruments used to measure well-being in children with disabilities, investigate their psychometric quality, cognitive accessibility and alignment with Keyes's operationalization of well-being, including emotional, psychological and social aspects.
Methods: MEDLINE, ProQuest, PubMed and CINAHL were searched for articles published from 2011 to March 2023, identifying 724 studies. Synonyms provided by thesaurus on the main constructs: 'children', 'measure', 'disability' and 'mental health' were employed in the search strategy.