A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Development of a Novel Scar Screening System with Machine Learning. | LitMetric

Development of a Novel Scar Screening System with Machine Learning.

Plast Reconstr Surg

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Komaki City Hospital; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine; Shiromoto Clinic; Department of Intelligent Science, Graduate School of Informatics, N

Published: August 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Hypertrophic scars and keloids tend to cause serious functional and cosmetic impediments to patients. As these scars are not life threatening, many patients do not seek proper treatment. Thus, educating physicians and patients regarding these scars is important. The authors aimed to develop an algorithm for a scar screening system and compare the accuracy of the system with that of physicians. This algorithm was designed to involve health care providers and patients.

Methods: Digital images were obtained from Google Images (Google LLC, Mountain View, Calif.), open access repositories, and patients in the authors' hospital. After preprocessing, 3768 images were uploaded to the Google Cloud AutoML Vision platform and labeled with one of the four diagnoses: immature scars, mature scars, hypertrophic scars, and keloid. A consensus label for each image was compared with the label provided by physicians.

Results: For all diagnoses, the average precision (positive predictive value) of the algorithm was 80.7 percent, the average recall (sensitivity) was 71 percent, and the area under the curve was 0.846. The algorithm afforded 77 correct diagnoses with an accuracy of 77 percent. Conversely, the average physician accuracy was 68.7 percent. The Cohen kappa coefficient of the algorithm was 0.69, while that of the physicians was 0.59.

Conclusions: The authors developed a computer vision algorithm that can diagnose four scar types using automated machine learning. Future iterations of this algorithm, with more comprehensive accuracy, can be embedded in telehealth and digital imaging platforms used by patients and primary doctors. The scar screening system with machine learning may be a valuable support tool for physicians and patients.

Clinical Question/level Of Evidence: Diagnostic, II.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009312DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scar screening
12
screening system
12
machine learning
12
system machine
8
hypertrophic scars
8
patients scars
8
images google
8
algorithm
7
scars
6
patients
5

Similar Publications