Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Until recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAp) has mostly been performed using lumen-less fixed screw leads. There are limited data on LBBAp with conventional style-driven extendable screw-in (SDES) leads, particularly data performed by operators with no previous experience with LBBAp procedures. In total, 42 consecutive patients undergoing LBBAp using SDES leads and newly designed delivery sheaths (LBBAp group) were compared with those treated with conventional right ventricular pacing (RVp) for atrioventricular block (RVp group, n = 84) using propensity score matching (1:2 ratio). The LBBAp was successful in 83% (35/42) of patients, with satisfactory pacing thresholds (0.8 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms). In the LBBAp group, the mean paced-QRS duration obtained during RV apical pacing (173 ± 18 ms) was significantly reduced by LBBAp (116 ± 14 ms, p < 0.001). Compared with the RVp group, the LBBAp group showed more physiological pacing, suggested by a much narrower paced-QRS duration (116 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 21 ms, p < 0.001). The pacing threshold was comparable in both groups. The LBBAp group revealed stable pacing thresholds for 6.8 ± 4.8 months post-implant and no serious complications including lead dislodgement or septal perforation. The novel approach of LBBAp using SDES leads and the new dedicated pre-shaped delivery sheaths was effectively and safely performed, even by inexperienced operators with LBBAp procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9104478PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092483DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lbbap group
16
delivery sheaths
12
lbbap
12
sdes leads
12
left bundle
8
bundle branch
8
branch area
8
pacing
8
area pacing
8
extendable screw-in
8

Similar Publications

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which includes left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) that captures the left bundle branch (LBB) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) that does not, has been reported to improve clinical outcomes compared to right ventricular pacing (RVP). However, the clinical impact of LBB capture remains unclear.

Objective: To compare the incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) and post-operative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between RVP and LBBAP in patients with normal pre-implantation LVEF, and to assess the impact of LBB capture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There are limited prospective randomized studies comparing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and biventricular (BiV) pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Aim: The study tested whether LBBAP is noninferior to BiV pacing in patients with Class I indication for CRT.

Methods: The CSP-SYNC study is an investigator-initiated, randomized, single-center study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sex Differences and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared with Right Ventricular Pacing.

J Clin Med

July 2025

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 123, Dapi Road, Niao-Sung District, Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan.

: Long-term right ventricular pacing (RVP) can cause electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, resulting in adverse outcomes. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a physiological pacing modality and is considered a promising alternative. To date, the long-term outcomes of LBBAP compared with RVP, particularly with respect to sex differences, remain unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), is emerging as the preferred strategy for bradyarrhythmias and cardiac resynchronization therapy because of its clinical benefits. However, the differences in the impact of LBBAP vs right ventricular pacing (RVP) on cardiac energetics remain unclear.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LBBAP and RVP on cardiac energetics using a novel noninvasive pressure-volume (PV) loop algorithm derived from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is typically performed using the lumenless (LLL) Medtronic SelectSecure Model 3830 pacing lead. Stylet-driven leads (SDL) for LBBAP were recently introduced.

Objective: To compare the Abbott Tendril STS 2088TC SDL and CPS Locator 3D delivery system to the Medtronic LLL and delivery system acutely and chronically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF