Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Observational epidemiological analyses demonstrated a decreased risk of death and severe morbidity associated with caesarean delivery at term but an increased risk at preterm gestational age. A multicentre international randomized controlled compared planned caesarean section with vaginal birth and observed no difference in outcome; however, the trial included preterm and term births in approximately similar proportions. A subsequent re-analysis of the trial demonstrated that planned caesarean section was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome at preterm gestational ages, but reduced the risk of perinatal complications at term, consistent with the epidemiological studies. Hence, decision-making around mode of delivery for twins should recommend against routine caesarean delivery preterm. At term, the balance of risks and benefits will vary according to the mother's prioritization of avoiding intervention, her attitude to managing the risks of uncommon but potentially severe adverse events, and her plans and potential for future pregnancies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.03.015 | DOI Listing |