Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Germline pathogenic variations of the genes encoding the components of the Ras-MAPK pathway are found to be responsible for RASopathies, a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of diseases. In this study, we aimed to present the results of patients genetically investigated for RASopathy-related mutations in our Genetic Diagnosis Center.
Methods: The results of 51 unrelated probands with RASopathy and 4 affected relatives (31 male, 24 female; mean age: 9.327 ± 8.214) were included in this study. Mutation screening was performed on DNA samples from peripheral blood of the patients either by Sanger sequencing of hotspot regions (10/51 probands), or by a targeted amplicon next-generation sequencing panel (41/51 probands) covering the exonic regions of , and genes.
Results: Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variations found in 22 out of 51 probands (43.13%) and their 4 affected family members were located in , and genes. The c.148A>C (p.Thr50Pro) variation in the gene was a novel variant detected in a sibling in our patient cohort. We found supportive evidence for the pathogenicity of the gene c.5606G>T (p.Gly1869Val) variation which we defined in an affected boy who inherited the mutation from his affected father.
Conclusion: Although is the most frequently mutated gene in our patient cohort, as in most previous reports, different mutation distribution among the other genes studied motivates the use of a next-generation sequencing gene panel including the possible responsible genes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8928177 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000520722 | DOI Listing |