A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Supporting cancer patients to self-manage: Extent of use and perceptions of "trusted" online self-management resources. | LitMetric

Supporting cancer patients to self-manage: Extent of use and perceptions of "trusted" online self-management resources.

Patient Educ Couns

Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: July 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: Online resources can support patient self-management practices, but are not systematically used in routine clinical practice. We evaluated cancer patients' satisfaction with, and use of, tailored online resources.

Methods: Patients completed monthly validated electronic patient reported outcome measures (ePROMs) of distress, unmet needs and symptoms. Patients with ePROM scores above pre-determined thresholds received an email directing them to relevant online self-management resources. Perceptions and experiences with these resources were evaluated via an online survey 3, 6 and 9 months after their initial monthly ePRO; and a subset of patients was also interviewed. Webpage use was monitored through Google Analytics and ClickMeter.

Results: Overall, 221 patients completed evaluation surveys and 31 completed interviews. Patients spent 0-10 min on average accessing resources, with 93% indicating they would reuse them. The most viewed page was physical wellbeing (n = 680); exercise and nutrition resources were most popular; and 69% of patients were satisfied with information content, reporting resources were easy to understand and navigate.

Conclusions: Online resources are perceived as acceptable and useful. Design and delivery recommendations can improve their support of self-management.

Practice Implications: Incorporating automated online self-management resources into routine clinical workflows is a viable model to support routine follow up care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online self-management
12
self-management resources
12
resources
9
online resources
8
routine clinical
8
patients completed
8
patients
7
online
7
supporting cancer
4
cancer patients
4

Similar Publications