A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Nasal pressure swings as the measure of inspiratory effort in spontaneously breathing patients with de novo acute respiratory failure. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Excessive inspiratory effort could translate into self-inflicted lung injury, thus worsening clinical outcomes of spontaneously breathing patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Although esophageal manometry is a reliable method to estimate the magnitude of inspiratory effort, procedural issues significantly limit its use in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study is to describe the correlation between esophageal pressure swings (ΔP) and nasal (ΔP) as a potential measure of inspiratory effort in spontaneously breathing patients with de novo ARF.

Methods: From January 1, 2021, to September 1, 2021, 61 consecutive patients with ARF (83.6% related to COVID-19) admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) of the University Hospital of Modena (Italy) and candidate to escalation of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) were enrolled. Clinical features and tidal changes in esophageal and nasal pressure were recorded on admission and 24 h after starting NRS. Correlation between ΔP and ΔP served as primary outcome. The effect of ΔP measurements on respiratory rate and ΔP was also assessed.

Results: ΔP and ΔP were strongly correlated at admission (R = 0.88, p < 0.001) and 24 h apart (R = 0.94, p < 0.001). The nasal plug insertion and the mouth closure required for ΔP measurement did not result in significant change of respiratory rate and ΔP. The correlation between measures at 24 h remained significant even after splitting the study population according to the type of NRS (high-flow nasal cannulas [R = 0.79, p < 0.001] or non-invasive ventilation [R = 0.95, p < 0.001]).

Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with ARF, nasal pressure swings did not alter respiratory mechanics in the short term and were highly correlated with esophageal pressure swings during spontaneous tidal breathing. ΔP might warrant further investigation as a measure of inspiratory effort in patients with ARF.

Trial Registration: NCT03826797 . Registered October 2016.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8943795PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-03938-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inspiratory effort
16
spontaneously breathing
12
breathing patients
12
nasal pressure
8
pressure swings
8
measure inspiratory
8
effort spontaneously
8
patients novo
8
acute respiratory
8
respiratory failure
8

Similar Publications