98%
921
2 minutes
20
(1) Background: It has been hypothesized that a discrepancy exists in the understanding of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order among physicians. We hypothesized that a DNR order signed in the emergency department (ED) could influence the patients’ prognosis after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. (2) Methods: We included patients older than 17 years, who visited the emergency department for non-traumatic disease, who had respiratory failure, required ventilator support, and were admitted to the ICU between January 2010 and December 2016. The associations between DNR and mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and medical fees were analyzed. Prolonged hospital LOS was defined as hospital stay ≥75th percentile (≥26 days for the study). Patients were classified as those who did and did not sign a DNR order. A 1:4 propensity score matching was conducted for demographics, comorbidities, and etiology. (3) Results: The study enrolled a total of 1510 patients who signed a DNR and 6040 patients who did not sign a DNR. The 30-day mortality rates were 47.4% and 28.0% among patients who did and did not sign a DNR, respectively. A DNR order was associated with mortality after adjusting for confounding factors (hazard ratio, 1.9; confidence interval, 1.70−2.03). It was also a risk factor for prolonged hospital LOS in survivors (odds ratio, 1.2; confidence interval, 1.02−1.44). Survivors who signed a DNR order were charged higher medical fees than those who did not sign a DNR (217,159 vs. 245,795 New Taiwan Dollars, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Signing a DNR order in the ED increased the ICU mortality rate among patients who had respiratory failure and needed ventilator support. It increased the risk of prolonged hospital LOS among survivors. Finally, signing a DNR order was associated with high medical fees among survivors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956014 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10030434 | DOI Listing |
Healthcare (Basel)
August 2025
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zielona Gora, 65-046 Zielona Gora, Poland.
: Stroke-related deaths often follow rapid deterioration, making end-of-life (EOL) care decisions particularly challenging in acute settings. Although national guidelines support structured approaches to end-of-life care, there is limited evidence of how these pathways are applied in routine stroke practice. : To evaluate the use of structured end-of-life care pathways, including the AMBER Care Bundle and Dying Adults in the Last Days of Life (DALDL), in stroke patients who died during admission at a general hospital stroke center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Geriatr Soc
August 2025
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background: Goals of care conversations and documentation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) preferences through durable, portable medical orders are critical for aligning care with patient values. The stability of patient preferences over time remains uncertain, particularly among community-dwelling adults. The Department of Veterans Affairs Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative provides a unique opportunity to examine preference trajectories among seriously ill Veterans using longitudinal real-world data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm Surg
August 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Respecting patient wishes regarding resuscitation is fundamental to providing patient-centered care. Despite best practice guidelines for code status management for patients undergoing invasive procedures with existing Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders, compliance is low. Our interdisciplinary team created a workflow for code status management of inpatients with active DNR orders undergoing cardiac catheterization (CC) or electrophysiology (EP) procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAge Ageing
August 2025
Orthogeriatrics, Trauma Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK.
Introduction: Patients and clinicians often question whether a Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) decision might affect the attention paid to other aspects of patient care, or their access to interventions unrelated to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). We set out to directly test this proposition using a clinical vignette.
Methods: We presented a clinical scenario of a deteriorating patient to 226 senior geriatricians and specialist trainees.
Prehosp Disaster Med
August 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New JerseyUSA.
Introduction: Many factors influence the likelihood of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but gender disparities in prehospital care remain under-examined, particularly in relation to the bystander's connection to the patient.
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between gender and the likelihood of receiving BCPR in OHCA. The primary outcome of the study was to examine differences in BCPR rates among men and women who experienced OHCA.