Direct and indirect eluates from bulk fill resin-based-composites.

Dent Mater

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Published: March 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: To compare elutable substances directly released from bulk-fill (BF) resin-based composites (RBCs) with indirect elution from teeth restored with a BF composite. In addition to (co)monomers, the analytical focus was on other potentially toxic ingredients or impurities. Furthermore, the barrier function of the residual dentin/adhesive layer was studied.

Methods: Six BF-RBC materials were studied. For each material subgroup, ten human third molar teeth with standard Class-I occlusal cavities were prepared and provided with a three-step adhesive system and the respective composite restoration (tooth groups). Same sized control specimens of the restorative material were prepared ('direct BF-RBC' groups). Each specimen was placed in an elution chamber such that the elution media (ethanol/water, 3:1) only contacted the tooth root or ¾ height of each specimen. They were incubated at 37 °C for up to 7 d. Samples of eluate were taken after 1, 2, 4 and 7 d and were analysed by high-temperature gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Results: (Co)monomers such as Bisphenol A ethoxylate dimethacrylate (bisEMA) or tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEEGDMA) were mostly found in the eluates of the 'direct BF-RBC' groups in statistically significantly greater amounts than in the eluates of the 'tooth groups'. The residual dentin and/or adhesive layers acted as a diffusion barrier for most of the substances except for triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) or diethylene glycol dimethacrylate (DEGDMA). For TEGDMA up to 3 orders of magnitude more were found in the 'tooth groups' compared to the 'direct BF-RBC' groups, evidently released by the adhesive system. Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) including TINUVIN® 328 and BPA were found mainly in the eluates of 'direct BF-RBC' groups.

Significance: For estimation of biocompatibility, a total system, specifically BF-RBC + adhesive, should always be investigated since individual considerations, such as only elution from a BF-RBC, do not correctly reflect the total clinical situation. The focus of elution tests should not only be on the co(monomers), but also on other ingredients or impurities that may be released.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

'direct bf-rbc'
16
bf-rbc' groups
12
glycol dimethacrylate
12
ingredients impurities
8
adhesive system
8
eluates 'direct
8
'tooth groups'
8
elution
5
direct indirect
4
eluates
4

Similar Publications

Direct and indirect eluates from bulk fill resin-based-composites.

Dent Mater

March 2022

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Objectives: To compare elutable substances directly released from bulk-fill (BF) resin-based composites (RBCs) with indirect elution from teeth restored with a BF composite. In addition to (co)monomers, the analytical focus was on other potentially toxic ingredients or impurities. Furthermore, the barrier function of the residual dentin/adhesive layer was studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF