A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Prediction of nonviable myocardium by ECG Q-Wave parameters: A 3.0 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: The presence of a Q-wave on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has been considered a marker of a large myocardial infarction (MI). However, the correlation between the presence of Q-waves and nonviable myocardium is still controversial. The aims of this study were to 1) test QWA, a novel ECG approach, to predict transmural extent and scar volume using a 3.0 Tesla scanner, and 2) assess the accuracy of QWA and transmural extent.

Methods: Consecutive patients with a history of coronary artery disease who came for myocardial viability assessment by CMR were retrospectively enrolled. Q-wave measurements parameters including duration and maximal amplitude were performed from each surface lead. A 3.0 Tesla CMR was performed to assess LGE and viability.

Results: Total of 248 patients were enrolled in the study (with presence (n = 76) and absence of pathologic Q-wave (n = 172)). Overall prevalence of pathologic Q-waves was 27.2% (for LAD infarction patients), 20.0 % (for LCX infarction patients), and 16.8% (for RCA infarction patients). Q-wave area demonstrated high performance for predicting the presence of a nonviable segment in LAD territory (AUC 0.85, 0.77-0.92) and a lower, but still significant performance in LCX (0.63, 0.51-0.74) and RCA territory (0.66, 0.55-0.77). Q-wave area greater than 6 ms mV demonstrated high performance in predicting the presence of myocardium scar larger than 10% (AUC 0.82, 0.76-0.89).

Conclusion: Q-wave area, a novel Q-wave parameter, can predict non-viable myocardial territories and the presence of a significant myocardial scar extension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9039690PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.02.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infarction patients
12
q-wave area
12
nonviable myocardium
8
q-wave
8
demonstrated high
8
high performance
8
performance predicting
8
predicting presence
8
presence
6
patients
5

Similar Publications