MicroPET imaging of bacterial infection with nitroreductase-specific responsive F-labelled nitrogen mustard analogues.

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.

Published: July 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Bacterial infection and antibiotic resistance are serious threats to human health. This study aimed to develop two novel radiotracers, F-NTRP and F-NCRP, that possess a specific nitroreductase (NTR) response to image deep-seated bacterial infections using positron emission tomography (PET). This method can distinguish infection from sterile inflammation.

Methods: F-NTRP and F-NCRP were synthesized via a one-step method; all the steps usually involved in tracer radiosynthesis were successfully adapted in the All-In-One automated module. After the physiochemical properties of F-NTRP and F-NCRP were characterized, their specificity and selectivity for NTR were verified in E. coli and S. aureus. The ex vivo biodistribution of the tracers was evaluated in normal mice. MicroPET-CT imaging was performed in mouse models of bacterial infection and inflammation after the administration of F-NTRP or F-NCRP.

Results: Fully automated radiosynthesis of F-NTRP and F-NCRP was achieved within 90-110 min with overall decay-uncorrected, isolated radiochemical yields of 21.24 ± 4.25% and 11.3 ± 3.78%, respectively. The molar activities of F-NTRP and F-NCRP were 320 ± 40 GBq/μmol and 275 ± 33 GBq/µmol, respectively. In addition, F-NTRP and F-NCRP exhibited high selectivity and specificity for NTR response. PET-CT imaging in bacteria-infected mouse models with F-NTRP or F-NCRP showed significant radioactivity uptake in either E. coli- or S. aureus-infected muscles. The uptake for E. coli-infected muscles, 2.4 ± 0.2%ID/g with F-NTRP and 4.05 ± 0.49%ID/g with F-NCRP, was up to three times greater than that for uninfected control muscles. Furthermore, for both F-NTRP and F-NCRP, the uptake in bacterial infection was 2.6 times higher than that in sterile inflammation, allowing an effective distinction of infection from inflammation.

Conclusion: F-NTRP and F-NCRP are worth further investigation to verify their potential clinical application for distinguishing bacterial infection from sterile inflammation via their specific NTR responsiveness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05710-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

f-ntrp f-ncrp
36
bacterial infection
20
f-ntrp
11
f-ncrp
10
ntr response
8
infection sterile
8
mouse models
8
sterile inflammation
8
infection
7
bacterial
6

Similar Publications