98%
921
2 minutes
20
In this study, the occurrence of bisphenol S (BPS) in the meat and meat products from a recent Canadian Total Diet Study (TDS) was investigated in more detail. In addition to their composite samples, the individual raw meat and meat products were also analysed for BPS to investigate the variations of BPS levels and provide some information on the potential sources for BPS in meat. BPS was detected in all the 11 composite samples of different meat and meat products, with the highest level in roast beef (118.23 ng/g) and lowest in cured pork (0.14 ng/g) and cold cuts luncheon meats (0.18 ng/g). BPS was also detected in all the 84 individual raw meat and meat products, with the highest level of 257.61 ng/g in roast beef, followed by 190.41 ng/g in organ meats, 110.15 ng/g in beef steak, 27.91 ng/g in veal cutlets, 17.63 ng/g in wieners & sausages, and 15.27 ng/g in ground beef. However, significant variations of BPS levels were observed in the individual meat and meat product samples under the same category collected from different stores. This may indicate that packaging is unlikely the sources for BPS in meat otherwise BPS levels would have been more or less the same with the same type of packaging (Styrofoam and cling film) regardless where they were collected. Thus, sources other than food packaging, such as the contaminated feed and farming environment (e.g. grass) for animals (e.g. cow), may be possible and should be investigated in future studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2021.2023765 | DOI Listing |
J Hum Nutr Diet
October 2025
Haszard Biostatistics, Otago, New Zealand.
Introduction: Dependent older adults in residential aged care are at increased risk of inadequate micronutrient intakes. Knowledge of dietary intakes in this group is needed to inform clinical decision making and guide nutrition policy and menu planning. This study aimed to determine the usual intake and food sources of micronutrients of New Zealand aged-care residents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFood Funct
September 2025
Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality (LANUPRO), Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
It is unknown how human health is affected by the current increased consumption of ultra-processed plant-based meat analogues (PBMA). In the present study, rats were fed an experimental diet based on pork or a commercial PBMA, matched for protein, fat, and carbohydrate content for three weeks. Rats on the PBMA diet exhibited metabolic changes indicative of lower protein digestibility and/or dietary amino acid imbalance, alongside increased mesenteric (+38%) and retroperitoneal (+20%) fat depositions despite lower food and energy intake.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Anim Sci
September 2025
USDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, 68933 USA.
Low-coverage sequencing refers to sequencing DNA of individuals to a low depth of coverage (e.g., 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Anim Sci
September 2025
U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933, USA.
Liver abscesses are a concern in feedlot cattle, and little is known about the role of genetics in their development. This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters and to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with liver abscesses. Crossbred cattle representing 18 breeds in the United States Meat Animal Research Center Germplasm Evaluation Program were phenotyped for liver abscesses at slaughter (n = 9,044).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2025
UCD Perinatal Research Center, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Objective: To identify potential nutritional risks for women using the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in relation to region, age and pregnancy/intention.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using 1515 responses from the online version of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist available on the FIGO website. Participants who responded "No" to at least one dietary question were classified as at potential nutritional risk.