98%
921
2 minutes
20
Study Design: Retrospective clinical series.
Purpose: To search for spinal chordoma's survival rates, recurrences, and complications and compare sacral and mobile spine chordomas.
Overview Of Literature: The primary spinal chordoma treatment is mainly considered radical surgery, although recurrence rates are pretty high. Radical surgery with extra marginal resection is possible with significant neurologic deficits and very high complication rates.
Materials And Methods: This study reviews 48 spinal chordoma patients (sacrum 28, mobile spine 20) surgically treated between 1995 and 2019. Follow-up times ranged between 12 months and 238 months (average 6.16 years). Six patients were lost to follow-up after at least 1 year of control; three died 30 days after surgery.
Results: Surgery for sacrum tumors was an extra marginal resection (sacrectomy) in 19 patients, while nine patients had intralesional surgery. There were 13 cervical chordomas and seven thoracolumbar chordomas. Although we tried marginal resections for cervical chordomas, all had positive margins, and we accepted them as intralesional. Surgery for thoracolumbar chordomas was total spondylectomy in four cases and intralesional excision in three patients. Because of recurrences, the average surgery per patient was 3.45. It was more common in mobile spine chordomas (average 4.2) than sacral chordomas (average 2.92). Surgical complications of mobile spine chordomas (15/20; 75%) were also more than sacral chordomas (16/28; 57%). Chordomas of the mobile spine had no metastasis, while sacral chordomas had a 21% (6/28) metastasis rate. The recurrence rates of sacral chordomas (16/21; 76%) were not significantly different from the mobile spine (15/18; 83%). Among sacral chordomas, in all five cases who had no recurrence, the level of sacrectomy was S2 and below.
Conclusions: Recurrence and survival rates of mobile spine and sacral chordomas are not different. Sacral chordomas tend to metastasize. Sacrectomy is successful for sacral chordomas at S2 and below.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8740811 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_124_21 | DOI Listing |
Medicine (Baltimore)
September 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) presents a surgical challenge due to its transitional nature from mobile to rigid segments. Therefore, the biomechanical characteristics of this transitional zone must be taken into consideration during instrumentation. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of the cervical pedicle screw placement (CPS) combined with 5.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInterv Pain Med
September 2025
Division of PM&R, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway St., Redwood City, CA, USA.
Background: "Is this injection going to hurt?" Physicians typically answer this from experience since accurate answers are not available in the literature.
Objective: To quantify pain during common lumbosacral spine injections and compare to baseline pain prior to the injections. Analyze differences based on demographic and procedure variables.
J Neurosurg Case Lessons
August 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, Orthocentrum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Background: Chondrosarcomas are rare malignancies arising from the bone, primarily from the mobile spine. Multimodal treatment is the standard of care, with surgery as a cornerstone for local control since incomplete resection is the main driving factor for progression and disease-related mortality.
Observations: Here, the authors present the case of a patient who underwent an initial subtotal resection and adjuvant proton beam radiation therapy.
Int J Surg Protoc
June 2025
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Traumatic injuries remain a leading cause of preventable death globally, and continue to burden global healthcare services, particularly in low-resource settings. Mobile phone-based community injury response and coordination (mCIRC) systems represent a promising solution in facilitating rapid identification of injured persons, and coordinating a community-led response as an alternative or adjunct to a formal emergency service. mCIRC systems may use technologies such as geolocation and push notifications to mobilize trained responders in the vicinity of the incident, ensuring timely intervention before professional medical services arrive.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Spine Surg
August 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Wilkes-Barre, PA.
Study Design: Retrospective study.
Objective: (1) To compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between postoperative patients who were the most and least compliant in using mobile-based rehabilitation programs, (2) compare PROMs between patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical posterior decompression and instrumented fusion (PDIF), and (3) quantify the overall compliance rate.
Summary Of Background Data: Mobile applications for rehabilitation have been widely used following orthopedic procedures.