Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) affects many older adults. We investigated the efficacy and safety of adding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents to doublet chemotherapy (DC) in older patients.

Methods: Patients with RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic CRC (mCRC) receiving first-line DC + anti-EGFR (n = 1191) or DC alone (n = 729) from seven trials in the Aide de Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive database were included. The prognostic and predictive effects of age were investigated. Progression-free and overall survival (OS) were evaluated between age groups (≥70 vs <70) for DC + anti-EGFR. In addition, outcomes were compared between DC+/-anti-EGFR within age groups in three trials with a DC alone arm. Subsequently, the same analysis was conducted for left-sided tumours. Adverse events grade ≥3 (G3+) were compared between age groups.

Results: Older (vs younger) patients receiving DC + anti-EGFR had similar progression-free survival (PFS) (8.7 vs 10.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 [0.96-1.49];p = 0.107) but inferior OS (21.3 vs 26.3; HR = 1.36 [1.08-1.72];p = 0.011). DC + anti-EGFR (vs DC alone) improved OS (23.9 vs 20.3; HR = 0.82 [0.70-0.95];p = 0.008) and PFS (11.2 vs 8.9; HR = 0.70 [0.60-0.82];p < 0.001) in younger but not older patients: OS (24.7 vs 17.6; HR [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 0.77 [0.58-1.04];p = 0.092) and PFS (9.1 vs 8.7; HR [95% CI] = 0.85[0.63-1.15];p = 0.287). In left-sided 'only' tumours, the following outcomes for older (vs younger) patients were observed. For DC + anti-EGFR, PFS 9 versus 11.2 months; HR1.10 (95% CI 0.83-1.46); p = 0.52, OS 25.6 vs 30.3 HR 1.32 (95% CI 0.97-1.79), p = 0.086. For DC + anti-EGFR (vs DC alone), PFS and OS for younger patients were 11.9 vs 9.2 months HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.47-0.78) p < 0.001 and 24.1 versus 23.3 months HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.67-1.04), respectively. For older patients, PFS and OS were 13.1 versus 8.5 months, HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.93), P = 0.027 and 26.3 versus 16.5 months HR 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.85), respectively. There was no significant difference in toxicity among different age groups.

Conclusions: Older (vs younger) patients with mCRC RAS WT patients had comparable toxicity and efficacy with the addition of anti-EGFR agents to chemotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-epidermal growth
8
growth factor
8
factor receptor
8
patients ras
8
ras wild-type
8
wild-type metastatic
8
efficacy anti-epidermal
4
receptor agents
4
agents patients
4
metastatic colorectal
4

Similar Publications

Background: The rising burden of colorectal cancer with a high prevalence of advanced stages of new-onset is reported worldwide. While applied, chemotherapy can extend patients' survival, and proper tailoring is paramount. Based on computed tomography results, the study aimed to point out potential prognostic factors of complete or partial response to the initial three months of chemotherapy in palliative colorectal (CRC) cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies are the most recommended first-line treatment for wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines. However, primary resistance renders this treatment ineffective for almost 40% of patients. Our previous work identified Aurora kinase A (AURKA) as a key resistance driver through non-canonical, Hippo-independent Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) activation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The BRAF inhibitor encorafenib and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody cetuximab modestly improve survival for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) BRAF metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), characterized by higher immune activation than MSS BRAF colorectal cancer (CRC). In this phase 1/2 study (NCT04017650) of 26 participants with MSS BRAF mCRC who received encorafenib, cetuximab, and anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, we report an overall response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-71) and median progression-free survival of 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anti-PD-1 antibody (SCT-I10A) plus anti-EGFR antibody (SCT200) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter, open-label, phase 1b clinical trial.

Cancer

August 2025

Department of GI Medical Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical Unive

Background: This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death 1 antibody (SCT-I10A) and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody (SCT200) in patients with previously treated advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (trial registration number: NCT04229537).

Methods: This multicenter, open-label, phase 1b clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced ESCC refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapy. Patients who had not received prior treatment with programmed death-(ligand)1 (PD-(L)1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or anti-EGFR antibodies comprised cohort 1A, and those who had previously failed treatment with PD-(L)1 ICIs or anti-EGFR antibodies comprised cohort 1B.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD-TPI) plus bevacizumab is an established option for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Rechallenging RAS/BRAF-wild-type tumours with an anti-EGFR antibody in combination with FTD-TPI is emerging, yet the two strategies have not been directly compared. We retrospectively identified consecutive RAS/BRAF-wild-type, chemotherapy-refractory mCRC patients treated at National Taiwan University Hospital between December 2018 and March 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF