Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Abatacept was well tolerated by patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis in a phase 2, double-blind randomised trial, with potential efficacy at 12 months. We report here the results of an open-label extension for 6 months.

Methods: Patients (aged ≥18 years) with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis of less than 3 years' duration from their first non-Raynaud's symptom were enrolled into the ASSET trial (A Study of Subcutaneous Abatacept to Treat DiffuseCutaneous Systemic Sclerosis), which is a double-blind trial at 22 sites in Canada, the UK, and the USA. Aftercompletion of 12 months of treatment with either abatacept or placebo, patients received a further 6 months ofabatacept (125 mg subcutaneous every week) in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint of the double-blind trial was modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) at 12 months, which was reassessed at 18 months in the open-label extension. The primary analysis included all participants who completed the double-blind trial and received at least one dose of open-label treatment (modified intention to treat). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02161406.

Findings: Between Sept 22, 2014, and March 15, 2017, 88 participants were randomly allocated in the double-blind trial either abatacept (n=44) or placebo (44); 32 patients from each treatment group completed the 6-month open-labelextension. Among patients assigned abatacept, a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS was noted at 12 months (-6·6 [SD 6·4]), with further improvement seen during the open-label extension period (-9·8 [8·1] at month 18). Participants assigned placebo had a mean improvement from baseline in mRSS at 12 months (-3·7 [SD 7·6]), with a further improvement at month 18 (-6·3 [9·3]). Infections during the open-label extension phase occurred in nine patients in the placebo-abatacept group (12 adverse events, one serious adverse event) and in 11 patients in theabatacept-abatacept group (14 adverse events, one serious adverse event). Two deaths occurred during the 12-month double-blind period in the abatacept group, which were related to scleroderma renal crisis; no deaths were recorded during the open-label extension.

Interpretation: During the 6-month open-label extension, no new safety signals for abatacept were identified in the treatment of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Clinically meaningful improvements in mRSS and other outcome measures were observed in both the abatacept and placebo groups when patients transitioned to open-label treatment. These data support further studies of abatacept in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb and National Institutes of Health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8713509PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30237-XDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

open-label extension
28
diffuse cutaneous
20
cutaneous systemic
20
systemic sclerosis
20
double-blind trial
16
mrss months
12
abatacept
10
open-label
10
early diffuse
8
extension phase
8

Similar Publications

Background And Objectives: Deucravacitinib, a first-in-class, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy across the primary endpoint and all key secondary endpoints in the phase 2 PAISLEY SLE trial in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Here, we describe 2 phase 3 trials [POETYK SLE-1 (NCT05617677), POETYK SLE-2 (NCT05620407)] which will assess the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib in patients with active SLE. These phase 3 trials have been designed to replicate the successful elements of the phase 2 trial, including its glucocorticoid-tapering strategy and disease activity adjudication.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: No head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) with cipaglucosidase alfa + miglustat (Cipa+mig) have been conducted in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Two indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) were conducted to estimate the effects of AVA versus Cipa+mig.

Methods: ITCs were conducted using simulated treatment comparisons (STCs), adjusting for differences in prognostic factors and treatment effect modifiers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical progression on CDR-SB©: Progression-free time at each 0.5 unit level in dominantly inherited and sporadic Alzheimer's disease populations.

Alzheimers Dement

September 2025

Department of Psychiatry and The Behavioral Sciences, Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Introduction: Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is a reliable and clinically meaningful composite for assessing treatment effects in Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Small CDR-SB differences at the end of a trial often lead to controversy in deriving clinically meaningful interpretations.

Methods: We estimated progression-free time (PFT) participants remained at each 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (60-66 Gy) following surgery for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has excellent oncological control but high treatment morbidity. We aimed to compare toxicity of a 30-36 Gy regimen of de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy and standard of care treatment.

Methods: We did this phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial in two academic sites in the USA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 10-week randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed efficacy of micronutrients in improving symptoms associated with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This study investigated duration effects of micronutrient treatment through the open label (OL) phase and document the micronutrient effect on those initially allocated to placebo. Children aged 7-12 years randomized to micronutrients or placebo for 10 weeks (RCT), then received 10 weeks OL, creating two groups: placebo first then micronutrients (P-M) or micronutrients in both phases (M-M).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF