98%
921
2 minutes
20
The incidence of heart failure is primarily flat or declining for a presumably reflecting better management of cardiovascular diseases, but that of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is probably increasing for the lack of an established effective treatment. Moreover, there is no specific pharmacological treatment for patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) since no substantial prospective randomized clinical trial has been performed exclusively in such population. According to the recent 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, the triad composed of an Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI), a beta-blocker, and a Mineralcorticoid Receptor Antagonist is the cornerstone therapy for all patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but a substantial gap exists for patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF. Despite the important role of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) in heart failure pathophysiology, RAAS blockers were found ineffective for HFpEF patients. Indeed, even the new drug class of ARNI was found effective only in HFrEF patients. In this regard, a therapeutic alternative may be represented by drug stimulating the non-classic RAAS (ACE2 and A1-7) as well as other emerging drug classes (such as SGLT2 inhibitors). Reflecting on this global health burden and the gap in treatments among heart failure phenotypes, we summarize the leading players of heart failure pathophysiology, the available pharmacological treatments for each heart failure phenotype, and that in future development.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.106035 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Heart Fail
September 2025
Cardiology Department, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Aims: There is a lack of data from randomized clinical trials comparing treatment outcomes between conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities and biventricular pacing (BVP) in symptomatic patients with refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA). The CONDUCT-AF investigates whether CSP is non-inferior to BVP in improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with symptomatic AF undergoing AVNA.
Methods: This study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial conducted across 10 European centres, enrolling 82 patients with symptomatic AF, HF with reduced LVEF, and narrow QRS.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Importance: The cardiovascular benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may vary by body mass index (BMI), but evidence on BMI-specific outcomes remains limited.
Objective: To investigate the associations of GLP-1 RA use with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes across BMI categories in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Chang Gung Research Database, a clinical dataset covering multiple hospitals in Taiwan.
Curr Opin Cardiol
August 2025
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London.
Purpose Of Review: Symptom relief is now recognized as the primary remit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. The relationship between the nature of angina symptoms and the likelihood of successful symptom relief from PCI had not been systematically studied until recently.
Recent Findings: The ORBITA-2 symptom-stratified analysis found that while the severity and nature of symptoms were poorly associated with the severity of coronary disease, the nature of the symptoms powerfully predicted the efficacy of PCI in relieving angina.
Cardiol Rev
September 2025
From the Department of General Medicine, J.S.S. Medical College, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of all heart failure cases and is increasing in prevalence due to aging populations and comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes. While echocardiography remains the diagnostic cornerstone, many patients with preserved ejection fraction present with nonspecific symptoms and ambiguous diastolic indices, leading to diagnostic uncertainty and therapeutic delay. Arterial stiffness-quantified by pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and cardio-ankle vascular index)-is emerging as a key contributor to HFpEF pathophysiology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCardiovasc Res
September 2025
Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Piazza Miraglia, 2, Naples 80138, Italy.