98%
921
2 minutes
20
BACKGROUNDMEK inhibitors have limited activity in biliary tract cancers (BTCs) as monotherapy but are hypothesized to enhance responses to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition.METHODSThis open-label phase II study randomized patients with BTC to atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor). Eligible patients had unresectable BTC with 1 to 2 lines of prior therapy in the metastatic setting, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).RESULTSSeventy-seven patients were randomized and received study therapy. The trial met its primary endpoint, with a median PFS of 3.65 months in the combination arm versus 1.87 months in the monotherapy arm (HR 0.58, 90% CI 0.35-0.93, 1-tail P = 0.027). One patient in the combination arm (3.3%) and 1 patient in the monotherapy arm (2.8%) had a partial response. Combination therapy was associated with more rash, gastrointestinal events, CPK elevations, and thrombocytopenia. Exploratory analysis of tumor biopsies revealed enhanced expression of antigen processing and presentation genes and an increase in CD8/FoxP3 ratios with combination treatment. Patients with higher baseline or lower fold changes in expression of certain inhibitory ligands (LAG3, BTLA, VISTA) on circulating T cells had evidence of greater clinical benefit from the combination.CONCLUSIONThe combination of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib prolonged PFS as compared with atezolizumab monotherapy, but the low response rate in both arms highlights the immune-resistant nature of BTCs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201458.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI) Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; NCI, NIH (R01 CA228414-01 and UM1CA186691); NCI's Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Gastrointestinal Cancers (P50 CA062924); NIH Center Core Grant (P30 CA006973); and the Passano Foundation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670844 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI152670 | DOI Listing |
NPJ Breast Cancer
June 2025
Departments of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Despite the availability of numerous treatment options for metastatic estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, additional strategies are needed, particularly when tumors become endocrine resistant. This phase Ib/II study examined the clinical activity and safety of the novel combination of atezolizumab with molecularly targeted therapy inhibiting 1) the Ras/Raf/MEK signaling pathway with cobimetinib in TP53-mutant tumors (arm COBI) or 2) the TP53 regulator MDM2 with idasanutlin in TP53-wild-type tumors (arm IDA). Twelve patients were enrolled before the study closed early due to slow accrual.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Oncol
June 2025
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Background: Precision cancer medicine (PCM) is key to advancing cancer treatment beyond the standard of care. We performed an explorative clinical trial, MEGALiT, to investigate the feasibility, safety, and clinical benefit of genomics-based PCM in advanced cancer.
Methods: MEGALiT recruited adult patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment.
ESMO Open
May 2025
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT-West), Campus Essen, Essen, Germany; Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germa
Background: Optimal sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies (TTs) in BRAF-positive advanced melanoma should achieve rapid tumour control and durable progression-free survival (PFS), translating into prolonged overall survival (OS).
Patients And Methods: The 1 : 1 randomised phase II ImmunoCobiVem trial compared-after a 3-month run-in phase with vemurafenib (VEM, 960 mg twice daily) and cobimetinib (COB, 60 mg daily days 21-28, q4w)-continuous VEM + COB until disease progression (PD1) and second-line atezolizumab (ATEZO, 1200 mg, q3w) in arm A versus early switch to ATEZO after run-in, followed by crossover to VEM + COB at PD1, in arm B. PFS from the start of run-in until PD1 was the primary endpoint (PFS1); secondary efficacy endpoints were OS, overall PFS (PFS2) and PFS3 (time from PD1 to PD after crossover, i.
J Immunother Cancer
April 2025
Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Background: Neoadjuvant treatment has become standard for patients with high-risk operable stage III melanoma, but the optimal regimen is unknown. Targeted therapy approaches yield high pathological response rates, while immunotherapy regimens show favorable recurrence-free survival (RFS). NeoACTIVATE was designed to address whether a neoadjuvant combination of both targeted therapy and immunotherapy might leverage the benefits of each.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
October 2024
Skin tumors department, NN Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia.
Background: Among several treatment options for BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, a combination of BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, and anti-PDL1 antibody seems to be a new emergent approach recently registered in the Russian Federation. It is still not clear which patient population benefits more from this simultaneous use of three drugs instead of its sequencing.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate patients' characteristics treated in real practice in 14 Russian regions by triple combination and to analyze their outcomes depending on biomarkers (PD-L1 expression).