A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Clinical predictors of working memory performance in obstructive sleep apnea patients before and during extended wakefulness. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Study Objectives: Extended wakefulness (EW) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) impair working memory (WM), but their combined effects are unclear. This study examined the impact of EW on WM function in OSA patients and identified clinical predictors of WM impairment.

Methods: Following polysomnography (PSG), 56 OSA patients (mean ± SD, age 49.5 ± 8.9, apnea hypopnea index 38.1 ± 25.0) completed WM 2-back performance tasks 10 times over 24 h of wakefulness to assess average accuracy and completion times measured after 6-12 h awake (baseline) compared to 18-24 h awake (EW). Hierarchical cluster analysis classified participants with poorer versus better WM performance at baseline and during EW. Clinical predictors of performance were examined via regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses.

Results: WM performance decreased following EW and showed consistent correlations with age, Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), total sleep time, and hypoxemia (O2 nadir and mean O2 desaturation) at baseline and with EW (all p < .01). O2 nadir and age were significant independent predictors of performance at baseline (adjusted R2 = 0.30, p < .01), while O2 nadir and ESS were predictors of WM following EW (adjusted R2 = 0.38, p < .001). ROC analysis demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity of models to predict poorer versus better performing participants at baseline (83% and 69%) and during EW (84% and 74%).

Conclusions: O2 nadir, age, and sleepiness show prognostic value for predicting WM impairment in both rested and sleep-deprived OSA patients and may guide clinicians in identifying patients most at risk of impaired WM under both rested and heightened sleep pressure conditions.Clinical Trial Registration: This manuscript presents data collected as part of a larger trial-ANZCTR: Novel brain biomarkers of performance impairment in sleep apnea-https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=363830, No. ACTRN12613001171707.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsab289DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical predictors
12
osa patients
12
working memory
8
obstructive sleep
8
sleep apnea
8
extended wakefulness
8
poorer versus
8
versus better
8
performance baseline
8
predictors performance
8

Similar Publications