Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Ann Intern Med

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (K.K.).

Published: January 2022


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 75 years remains unclear.

Objective: To estimate benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of extending mammography to age 80, 85, or 90 years according to comorbidity burden.

Design: Markov microsimulation model.

Data Sources: SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program and Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Target Population: U.S. women aged 65 to 90 years in groups defined by Charlson comorbidity score (CCS).

Time Horizon: Lifetime.

Perspective: National health payer.

Intervention: Screening mammography to age 75, 80, 85, or 90 years.

Outcome Measures: Breast cancer death, survival, and costs.

Results Of Base-case Analysis: Extending biennial mammography from age 75 to 80 years averted 1.7, 1.4, and 1.0 breast cancer deaths and increased days of life gained by 5.8, 4.2, and 2.7 days per 1000 women for comorbidity scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. Annual mammography beyond age 75 years was not cost-effective, but extending biennial mammography to age 80 years was ($54 000, $65 000, and $85 000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY] gained for women with CCSs of 0, 1, and ≥2, respectively). Overdiagnosis cases were double the number of deaths averted from breast cancer.

Results Of Sensitivity Analysis: Costs per QALY gained were sensitive to changes in invasive cancer incidence and shift of breast cancer stage with screening mammography.

Limitation: No randomized controlled trials of screening mammography beyond age 75 years are available to provide model parameter inputs.

Conclusion: Although annual mammography is not cost-effective, biennial screening mammography to age 80 years is; however, the absolute number of deaths averted is small, especially for women with comorbidities. Women considering screening beyond age 75 years should weigh the potential harms of overdiagnosis versus the potential benefit of averting death from breast cancer.

Primary Funding Source: National Cancer Institute and National Institutes of Health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621600PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M20-8076DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mammography age
36
age years
36
screening mammography
20
breast cancer
16
mammography
10
age
10
years
10
cost-effectiveness screening
8
extending biennial
8
biennial mammography
8

Similar Publications

Background The optimal surgical management of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with calcifications remains controversial, particularly when pathologic complete response (pCR) is suspected. Purpose To identify factors associated with pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and assess whether calcifications affect the performance of radiologic complete response (rCR) at MRI for predicting pCR. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab and underwent surgery between January 2021 and October 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Do breast cancer survivors benefit from mammography screening? A population-based study.

Cancer Epidemiol

September 2025

Research Unit for Screening and Epidemiology, Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Background: Mammography screening reduces breast cancer mortality by approximately 25 % in the general population and might therefore also benefit breast cancer survivors. However, its impact on mortality rates in this group remains unstudied. We aimed to estimate the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality in this population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The recently reported results from the COMET trial investigating the nonoperative management of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) question the need for routine excision of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). This study aimed to examine the upgrade rates of patients with ADH who met applicable COMET trial criteria.

Methods: Cases of ADH managed with surgery at our institution between 2004 and 2022 were identified, and clinical variables were extracted from the medical record.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Few consensus guidelines exist regarding screening mammography recommendations for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals.

Objective: Our study aimed to assess the utilization of screening mammograms in a large cohort of TGD individuals at a single institution and the factors influencing mammogram uptake.

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

By reliably classifying screening mammograms as negative, artificial intelligence (AI) could minimize radiologists' time spent reviewing high volumes of normal examinations and help prioritize examinations with high likelihood of malignancy. To compare performance of AI, classified as positive at different thresholds, with that of radiologists, focusing on NPV and recall rates, in large population-based digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening cohorts. This retrospective single-institution study included women enrolled in the observational population-based Athena Breast Health Network.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF