Impact of growth hormone supplementation on improving oocyte competence in unexplained poor embryonic development patients of various ages.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of Growth hormone (GH) co-treatment during fertilization (IVF) cycles in women of different ages who manifest unexplained poor embryonic development.

Method: This cohort study included a total of 2647 patients with unexplained poor embryonic development in their previous IVF procedures: 872 women received GH co-treatment and 1775 untreated women served as a control group. Patients were divided into 6 groups according to treatment and stratified by age (<35 years of age, A-GH group and A-control group; 35-40 years, B-GH group and B-control group; and ≥40 years, C-GH group and C-control group). The primary outcome was the oocyte-cleavage rate and the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR).

Results: The oocyte-cleavage rates among the three age groups were significantly higher in the GH group compared to the same-aged control group. In both group A and group B, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the GH group and controls. However, in patients ≥40 years of age, the clinical pregnancy rate in the GH group was significantly higher than in the control group (31.8% vs. 13.7%,  = 0.019). In the three age groups, there was no significant difference in the live birth rate between the GH group and controls. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis model, in both group A and group B, the number of cleaved embryos was independent predictors for CPR (OR = 1.464, 95% CI: 1.311-1.634; respectively, OR = 1.336, 95% CI: 1.126-1.586); Besides, in both group B and group C, age was independent predictors for CPR (OR = 0.657, 95%CI: 0.555-0.778; respectively, OR = 0.622, 95%CI: 0.391-0.989). However, only in group C, supplementation GH increased CPR as compared with not supplementation GH (OR = 2.339, 95%CI: 1.182-6.670).

Conclusions: For patients with unexplained poor embryonic development, supplementation with GH increased the oocyte-cleavage rates in all three age groups, and the clinical pregnancy rate gradually improved commensurate with increasing age. There was no difference in the clinical pregnancy rate in group A and group B, but group C improved significantly. Therefore, compared with patients under 40 years of age, patients ≥40 may benefit more from GH supplementation.