Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Within a few years of its' discovery, ionizing radiation demonstrated adverse effects on biological systems. Since that time great strides were made in both radiation protection, detection, and personnel monitoring. Monitoring occupational radiation dose to individuals is enforced by several regulatory agencies in the United States (U.S.) and is referenced in numerous sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). A literature review with an examination of regulatory guidelines and a Radiation Safety Officers (RSO) survey was conducted to evaluate how often radiation dose exposure is monitored when an individual receives occupational radiation dose at more than one facility. The length of time an RSO has overseen the radiation safety program at his/her institution can impact if dosimetry reports are requested for individuals that work at multiple places. Despite having safer equipment and occupational radiation exposure standards, there is no universal mechanism to track and record exposure for individuals working at more than one institution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.243154 | DOI Listing |