Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Specialized extractant ligands - such as tri-butyl phosphate (TBP), ,-di-(2-ethylhexyl)butyramide (DEHBA), and ,-di-2-ethylhexylisobutryamide (DEHiBA) - have been developed for the recovery of uranium from used nuclear fuel by reprocessing solvent extraction technologies. These ligands must function in the presence of an intense multi-component radiation field, and thus it is critical that their radiolytic behaviour be thoroughly evaluated. This is especially true for their metal complexes, where there is negligible information on the influence of complexation on radiolytic reactivity, despite the prevalence of metal complexes in used nuclear fuel reprocessing solvent systems. Here we present a kinetic investigation into the effect of uranyl (UO) complexation on the reaction kinetics of the dodecane radical cation (RH˙) with TBP, DEHBA, and DEHiBA. Complexation had negligible effect on the reaction of RH˙ with TBP, for which a second-order rate coefficient () of (1.3 ± 0.1) × 10 M s was measured. For DEHBA and DEHiBA, UO complexation afforded an increase in their respective rate coefficients: (RH˙ + [UO(NO)(DEHBA)]) = (2.5 ± 0.1) × 10 M s and (RH˙ + [UO(NO)(DEHiBA)]) = (1.6 ± 0.1) × 10 M s. This enhancement with complexation is indicative of an alternative RH˙ reaction pathway, which is more readily accessible for [UO(NO)(DEHBA)] as it exhibited a much larger kinetic enhancement than [UO(NO)(DEHiBA)], 2.6× 1.4×, respectively. Complementary quantum mechanical calculations suggests that the difference in reaction kinetic enhancement between TBP and DEHBA/DEHiBA is attributed to a combination of reaction pathway (electron/hole transfer proton transfer) energetics and electron density distribution, wherein attendant nitrate counter anions effectively 'shield' TBP from RH˙ electron transfer processes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1cp03797h | DOI Listing |