A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Are critical shoulder angle and acromion index correlated to the size of a rotator cuff tear. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: Scapular morphology is an extrinsic factor playing role in rotator cuff tear (RCT) etiology. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between critical shoulder angle (CSA) and acromion index (AI) with partial-bursal side and full thickness RCT and the size of the RCT.

Hypothesis: The hypothesis was that CSA and AI would be greater in partial bursal-side RCT and full-thickness RCT patients and would increase with the size of the RCT.

Methods: This retrospective study assessed 218 patients who had standard shoulder radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were divided into three groups: intact rotator cuff (68), partial bursal-side RCT (34) and full-thickness RCT (116). In the second part, full-thickness RCT patients were divided into four groups according to RCT size; small (<1cm), medium (1-3cm), large (3-5cm) and massive (>5cm). AI and CSA measurements were evaluated from radiographs.

Results: The mean CSA was 32.8̊ in control group, 34.3̊ in partial group and 36.9̊ in full-thickness group. The mean AI was 0.66, 0.68 and 0.72 respectively. Significant difference was found in AI and CSA between full thickness RCT and intact RC group (p<0.01), and partial RCT and full thickness RCT group (p<0.05) in paired comparisons. In full thickness RCT size groups the mean CSA was 34.2̊, 36.4̊, 39.0̊ and 40.8̊ and mean AI was 0.70, 0.71, 0.73 and 0.79 respectively. Significant difference was found between small-large, small-massive, medium-massive groups for CSA in paired comparisons and between small-massive, medium-massive groups for AI.

Conclusion: CSA and AI were significantly greater in full-thickness RCT patients and the size of the RCT increased with CSA and AI. The greater CSA and AI could be predictors for larger RCT.

Level Of Evidence: III; Cross-Sectional Design; Prognosis Study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103122DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotator cuff
12
full-thickness rct
12
rct
9
critical shoulder
8
shoulder angle
8
cuff tear
8
full thickness
8
thickness rct
8
rct size
8
partial bursal-side
8

Similar Publications