Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

While Medicare is the universal source of health care coverage for Americans aged 65 years or older, the program requires significant cost sharing in terms of out-of-pocket (OOP) spending. We conducted a retrospective study using data from 2016 to 2018 Medicare Current Beneficiary Surveys of elderly community-dwelling beneficiaries ( = 10,431) linked with administrative data to estimate OOP spending associated with the "big four" chronic diseases (cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and chronic lung disease). We estimated a generalized linear model adjusting for predisposing, enabling, and need factors to estimate annual OOP spending. We found that beneficiaries with any of the "big four" chronic conditions spent 15% ( < .001) higher OOP costs and were 56% more likely to spend ≥20% of annual income on OOP expenditure (adjusted odds ratio = 1.56; < .001) compared with those without any of those conditions. OOP spending appears to be heterogeneous across disease types and changing by conditions over time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10775587211032837DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oop spending
16
"big four"
12
four" chronic
12
oop
6
spending
5
financial burdens
4
burdens out-of-pocket
4
out-of-pocket spending
4
spending medicare
4
medicare fee-for-service
4

Similar Publications

The COVID-19 pandemic had significant widespread financial impacts, resulting in decreased household income, increased unemployment, and disrupted health services. Despite the higher prevalence of infections of tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in poorer populations, research on the financial challenges faced by these populations during the pandemic is still limited. Indonesia recorded the highest COVID-19 cases in Southeast Asia (6,815,156) while contending with the dual burden of HIV and TB.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Insight about episode spending after elective procedures has driven interest in bundling reimbursement for surgical procedures. However, little is known about episode spending for health systems (payments) and patients (out-of-pocket [OOP] expenses) after unplanned, nonelective procedures such as hand trauma.

Methods: The authors used 2019-2022 national claims to conduct a cohort study of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of a distal radius fracture, and replantation/revascularization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Given increasing costs of neurologic medications, there is a need to explore alternative options to minimize medication spending.

Objective: To compare 2024 neurologic medication costs from commercial insurance plans with those available in the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company, a direct-to-consumer pharmacy.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study compared medication costs through a direct-to-consumer pharmacy with model-estimated 2024 costs from commercial and Medicare supplemental databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Latin American countries have long struggled with socioeconomic inequalities and health equity. In 2007, Ecuador implemented a health reform to address these issues by making public health services free, coordinating finances between subsystems and increasing the state's health budget. This study evaluates whether Ecuador's health system reform (2007-2017) reduced out-of-pocket (OOP) health spending, catastrophic health spending (CHS) and socioeconomic inequalities in CHS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Financial protection, an important objective of universal health coverage, ensures that individuals can access necessary healthcare without financial hardship. It is typically assessed through two indicators: catastrophic out-of-pocket (OOP) health spending and impoverishing health spending. Despite the introduction of Georgia's Universal Health Coverage Programme (UHCP) in 2013, which covers nearly 90% of the population, the incidence of impoverishing and catastrophic health spending remains high compared with other European countries and has not changed much over the past decade.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF