98%
921
2 minutes
20
Remdesivir is an adenosine analogue drug that targets RNA-dependent RNA polymerase enzyme and inhibits viral replication. As of 22nd October, 2020, US FDA fully approved the drug Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 patients who requires hospitalisation. Many clinical studies reported the derangement in hepatic and renal function tests, which is alarming considering the health conditions of the COVID-19 patients. In view of these results, the present study was envisaged to review the safety of Remdesivir in COVID-19 patients. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using the terms 'Remdesivir,' 'veklury,' 'SARS' and 'COVID' till 1st December, 2020. The studies included in this meta-analysis were either randomised or nonrandomised studies that evaluated Remdesivir for the treatment of COVID-19 against Placebo [standard of care]. The Adverse events [AEs], Serious adverse events [SAEs] and Treatment Discontinuation due to Adverse Events (TDAE) were used as primary outcome measures. The quality of studies was evaluated by using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for the assessment of RoB. Data analysis was performed by two authors (MK & DB) using statistical software Review manager [Revman] version 5.3. The pooled Risk Ratios (RR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated by using a random-effects model for both primary and secondary outcomes. A total of four RCTs were included for the meta-analysis. Out of the four included clinical trials accepted for its methodological quality, three were of excellent quality and one study was of moderate quality. The pooled estimates of the three studies showed that Remdesivir had a 24% lower risk of SAEs compared to the placebo arm. However, the pooled estimates of two studies showed that 10 days of Remdesivir had 56% higher risk of SAEs compared to 5 days of Remdesivir regimen. Similarly, the 10 days of Remdesivir had two times higher risk of TDAEs compared to 5 days Remdesivir regimen. In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated that Remdesivir is a safe therapeutic option. Our metanalysis revealed 5 days' regimen have better safety profile than 10 days' regimen of drug Remdesivir with respect to SAEs and TDAEs. For hospitalized patients, a 5-day course could be preferable with fewer safety concerns and lower drug costs. PROSPERO Registration ID: CRD 42020224272.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574886316666210728110330 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Hum Factors
September 2025
Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Costa Masnaga, Italy.
Background: Telerehabilitation is a promising solution to provide continuity of care. Most existing telerehabilitation platforms focus on rehabilitating upper limbs, balance, and cognitive training, but exercises improving cardiovascular fitness are often neglected.
Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a telerehabilitation intervention combining cognitive and aerobic exercises.
JMIR Public Health Surveill
September 2025
Center of Indigenous Health Care, Department of Community Health, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated economies and strained health care systems worldwide. Vaccination is crucial for outbreak control, but disparities persist between and within countries. In Taiwan, certain indigenous regions show lower vaccination rates, prompting comprehensive inquiries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: .Aim: To investigate the pathomorphological changes in the terminal chorionic villi during COVID-19 in pregnant women.
Patients And Methods: Materials and Methods: A total of 123 placentas were studied in cases of live term births (groups І) and antenatal asphyxia (groups ІІ).
Pol Merkur Lekarski
September 2025
FACULTY OF NURSING, UNIVERSITY OF KUFA, KUFA, IRAQ.
Objective: Aim: To evaluate clinical applicability of immune mediator's interleukin-16, immunoglobulin E along with eosinophil count in diagnosing COVID-19 and determining its severity.
Patients And Methods: Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional case-control study was conducted at Al-Najaf General Hospital, Najaf, Iraq between March and August 2024. 120 participants: 60 confirmed COVID-19 cases and 60 healthy controls which matched cases in terms of age and sex.
Crit Care Sci
September 2025
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus - Dresden, Sachsen, Germany.
The PROtective VEntilation (PROVE) Network is a globally-recognized collaborative research group dedicated to advancing research, education, and collaboration in the field of mechanical ventilation. Established to address critical questions in intraoperative and intensive care ventilation, the network focuses on improving outcomes for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in diverse settings, including operating rooms, intensive care units, burn units, and resource-limited environments in low- and middle-income countries. The PROVE Network is committed to generating high-quality evidence through a comprehensive portfolio of investigations, including randomized clinical trials, observational research, and meta-analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF