98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22991 (NCT00021450) showed that 6 months of concomitant and adjuvant androgen suppression (AS) improves event- (EFS, Phoenix) and clinical disease-free survival (DFS) of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostatic carcinoma, treated by external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at 70-78 Gy. We report the long-term results in intermediate-risk patients treated with 74 or 78 Gy EBRT, as per current guidelines.
Patient And Methods: Of 819 patients randomly assigned between EBRT or EBRT plus AS started on day 1 of EBRT, 481 entered with intermediate risk (International Union Against Cancer TNM 1997 cT1b-c or T2a with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 10 ng/mL or Gleason ≤ 7 and PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, N0M0) and had EBRT planned at 74 (342 patients, 71.1%) or 78 Gy (139 patients, 28.9%). We report the trial primary end point EFS, DFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) by intention-to-treat stratified by EBRT dose at two-sided α = 5%.
Results: At a median follow-up of 12.2 years, 92 of 245 patients and 132 of 236 had EFS events in the EBRT plus AS and EBRT arm, respectively, mostly PSA relapse (48.7%) or death (45.1%). EBRT plus AS improved EFS and DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53; CI, 0.41 to 0.70; < .001 and HR = 0.67; CI, 0.49 to 0.90; = .008). At 10 years, DMFS was 79.3% (CI, 73.4 to 84.0) with EBRT plus AS and 72.7% (CI, 66.2 to 78.2) with EBRT (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.53 to 1.02; = .065). With 140 deaths (EBRT plus AS: 64; EBRT: 76), 10-year OS was 80.0% (CI, 74.1 to 84.7) with EBRT plus AS and 74.3% (CI, 67.8 to 79.7) with EBRT, but not statistically significantly different (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.53 to 1.04; = .082).
Conclusion: Six months of concomitant and adjuvant AS statistically significantly improves EFS and DFS in intermediate-risk prostatic carcinoma, treated by irradiation at 74 or 78 Gy. The effects on OS and DMFS did not reach statistical significance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00855 | DOI Listing |
Pract Radiat Oncol
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre de Radiothérapie Charlebourg, La Défense, Groupe Amethyst, 65, avenue Foch, 92250 La Garenne-Colombes, France.
Purpose: Urinary toxicity following radical prostatectomy (RP) and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) includes urinary incontinence and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) strictures. With the increasing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), dose-escalation, and reirradiation within the prostate bed (PB), standardization of the definition of urinary organs at risk (OARs) in the post-RP setting is needed. This works aims to provide a comprehensive review of the anatomical and physiopathological changes occurring after RP, as well as to provide a consensus on urinary OARs delineation for prostate cancer (PCa) EBRT in the post-RP setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan J Urol
August 2025
Department of Urology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Background: Radical prostatectomy has long been the treatment of choice for men with clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in those with concurrent significant lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). For men who meet this description with marked prostatomegaly, we present a multi-institutional proof of concept study describing an alternative pathway of robotic simple prostatectomy (RASP) followed by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for the treatment of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed of 17 patients with PCa who underwent RASP followed by EBRT at two institutions from 2015-2023.
J Cancer Res Ther
September 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Objectives: To compare the effects of different adjuvant treatments for different pathological types of early-stage cervical cancer post-surgery.
Materials And Methods: Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I-II squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (ADC), and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) who underwent hysterectomy and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) from 2004 to 2015 in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program database were analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates were compared.
Am J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.
Objectives: In this study, we report conditional survival rate for gynecologic malignancies using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients who have received treatment with radiation therapy.
Methods: Utilizing the SEER 22 database and SEER*Stat 8.4.
Acta Oncol
September 2025
Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background: In 2015, a proton therapy (PT) facility was established in Sweden with one aim being to ensure access for all children expected to benefit from PT. Despite potential dosimetric advantages and full subsidisation, PT is not always selected. This study explores reasons for choosing alternative radiotherapy (RT) modalities in a paediatric population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF