Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

As social policies have changed to grant more rights to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals, some Christians in the United States have suggested that LGBT rights impede Christians' religious freedom. Across five studies, we examined the causes and consequences of zero-sum beliefs (ZSBs) about Christians and LGBT individuals. We demonstrate that Christians' beliefs about conflict with sexual minorities are shaped by their understandings of Christian values, social change, interpretation of the Bible, and in response to religious institutions. In Study 1, heterosexual cisgender Christians endorsed ZSBs more than other groups. Christians reported perceiving that anti-LGBT bias has decreased over time while anti-Christian bias has correspondingly increased. In Study 2, Christians' zero-sum beliefs increased after they reflected on religious values, suggesting that intergroup conflict is seen as being a function of Christian beliefs. Study 3 confirmed the role of symbolic threat in driving ZSBs; perceived conflict was accentuated when Christians read about a changing cultural climate in which Christians' influence is waning. An intervention using Biblical scripture to encourage acceptance successfully lowered zero-sum beliefs for mainline but not fundamentalist Christians (Study 4). A final field study examined how ZSBs predict sexual prejudice in response to changing group norms. After a special conference in which the United Methodist Church voted to restrict LGBT people from marriage and serving as clergy, zero-sum beliefs became a predictor of sexual prejudice (Study 5). We discuss the implications of Christian/LGBT ZSBs for religious freedom legislation, attitudes toward sexual minorities, and intergroup conflict more generally. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000363DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

zero-sum beliefs
20
lgbt individuals
8
religious freedom
8
sexual minorities
8
intergroup conflict
8
sexual prejudice
8
beliefs
7
christians
6
study
6
lgbt
5

Similar Publications

The 2023 Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action revealed the frayed relations between Asian and Black Americans. The gains that Black Americans have made were seen as coming at the expense of Asian Americans, suggesting a potential zero-sum perception. Three studies ( = 1,475 CloudResearch online participants) examined the extent to which Asian, Black, and White Americans perceived a zero-sum competition between Asian and Black people.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Solution spillover: Pairing issues with ideological solutions fuels polarization.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

August 2025

Fuqua School of Business, Management & Organizations, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.

Recent research has focused on understanding ideological and affective political polarization in the United States; however, the polarization of issue salience-defined as personal beliefs about how important or concerning an issue is, and how much attention or priority it deserves-has garnered less attention, especially regarding its underlying causes. We propose that issue salience polarization, particularly that of ideologically neutral issues, is driven in part by two psychological processes: solution aversion (denying problem severity when solutions are introduced that conflict with political beliefs) and solution attraction (exaggerating problem severity when solutions are introduced that align with political beliefs). If this is so, we should be able to observe issues that are nonpolarized at baseline become suddenly polarized when paired with solutions that are consistent with a specific ideological position (liberal or conservative).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The evolution of zero-sum and positive-sum worldviews.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

August 2025

Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, Université Toulouse Capitole, Toulouse 31000, France.

People and cultures differ in the extent to which they view the world as a zero-sum environment (where one person's gain is another's loss) or a positive-sum environment (where certain actions can benefit everyone). These beliefs shape individuals' willingness to work, invest, collaborate, or show hostility toward out-groups, and accept or reject various social policies. We model dyadic interactions in a heterogeneous population where individuals biased toward a zero-sum worldview are more likely to invest in competition, while those biased toward a positive-sum worldview are more likely to invest in cooperation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prioritizing organizational success and the pursuit of victory: Understanding the feelings of exclusion in the workplace.

Acta Psychol (Amst)

July 2025

Wichita State University, W. Frank Barton School of Business, Department of Finance, Real Estate, Decision Science, 1856 Fairmount St., Wichita, KS 67260, United States of America. Electronic address:

This study investigates how an organizational bottom-line mentality (BLM) climate influences employee perceptions of workplace ostracism, with a focus on the moderating role of zero-sum beliefs (ZSB). Using a survey of 220 full-time respondents in the United States, we conducted regression analysis and moderated mediation tests via Hayes' PROCESS macro in R. We measured perceived organizational BLM, employee BLM, ZSB, and work ostracism using validated scales.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Seller Cost Effect.

Exp Psychol

January 2025

Sino-Britain Center for Cognition and Ageing Research, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Beibei District, Chonqing City, PR China.

Cost plays a crucial role in commodity transactions, influencing the decisions of both buyers and sellers. Previous studies have focused either on the impact of seller costs on seller decisions or the influence of buyer costs on buyer decisions. However, it remains unclear whether seller costs directly affect buyers' purchasing decisions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF