A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Efficacy of 1 versus 3 days of intravenous amikacin as a prophylaxis for patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate: A prospective randomized trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: There are no uniform guidelines on the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 1 day versus 3 days of intravenous amikacin as prophylaxis, before TURP.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective randomized control trial, patients with sterile preoperative urine culture were randomized to receive either 1 day (Group A) or 3 days (Group B) of intravenous (IV) amikacin. All patients had their catheter removed on the 3 day and a midstream urine culture was obtained on the 4 day. The follow-up was scheduled at 1 week and at 1 month. The rate of bacteriuria on the 4 postoperative day was analyzed as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI), its risk factors, and other complications at 1 month.

Results: Of the 338 patients randomized, 314 patients were evaluable until day 7 and 307 until 1 month. Bacteriuria rate at day 4 (Group A: 8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.2-13.2]; Group B: 4.4% [95% CI: 1.2%-7.7%], = 0.124, Fisher's exact test) was similar in both the groups. At 1 month, the rate of symptomatic UTI was also similar in both the groups (3.5% [95% CI: 0.8-6.9] vs. 1.7% [95% CI: 0.2-4.2], = 0.344, Fisher's exact test). Bacteriuria (colony-forming unit, >10/ml) at day 4 was a significant risk factor for developing symptomatic UTI ( = 0.006). Antibiotic resistance was higher in Group B ( = 0.002) (Group A: 7.1% [95% CI: 6.3-20] vs. Group B: [71%, CI: 38-104], = 0.0021, Fisher's exact test).

Conclusion: One day is possibly noninferior to 3 days of IV amikacin as prophylaxis in patients undergoing TURP with respect to bacteriuria and symptomatic UTI, with an added advantage of lower antibiotic resistance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8173930PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_494_20DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous amikacin
12
amikacin prophylaxis
12
fisher's exact
12
symptomatic uti
12
day
9
versus days
8
days intravenous
8
prophylaxis patients
8
patients undergoing
8
transurethral resection
8

Similar Publications