A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Examining Variations in Action Plan Quality Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care. | LitMetric

Examining Variations in Action Plan Quality Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care.

J Am Board Fam Med

From the Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (PHK, NE); Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark (PHK, NE, SS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, USA (PHK, LF, MBP, MD, JP, DH); Steno Diabetes Center

Published: September 2021


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Collaborative goal setting and action-planning are key elements of self-management support for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), however little is known regarding action plan quality or correlation of quality in primary T2DM care.

Methods: T2DM patients from 12 primary care sites participated in either: Connection to Health (CTH; 6 practices), consisting of a health survey followed by collaborative action planning, or Enhanced Engagement CTH (EE-CTH; 6 practices), including additional training in relationship building promoting patient engagement. Action plan quality was rated using an adapted version of the Goal-Setting Evaluation Tool for Diabetes (GET-D) (dual coding of 20%, inter-rater reliability [IRR] >80%). Associations with patient characteristics were examined using generalized linear mixed models adjusting for clustering by clinic and intervention arm.

Results: With a mean score ± standard deviation (SD) of 14.62 ± 3.87 on a 0 to 20 scale (n = 725), overall action plan quality was moderate-high. Higher health literacy (β = 1.184, 95% CI, 0.326-2.041; = .007), and having no social risks (β = 0.416; 95% CI, 0.062-0.770; = .021) were associated with higher action plan quality, whereas sex, age, language, education level, depression, stress, and health distress were unrelated to quality ( value not significant). Higher quality was associated with greater patient confidence in the plan (β = 0.050; 95% CI, 0.016-0.084, = .004).

Conclusions: Although there was a considerable difference in action plan quality ratings, ratings did not systematically differ based on most patient demographic or mental health measures. Results suggest that action planning should be tailored to health literacy and social risks. Further research should examine associations between quality and longer-term clinical outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200285DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

action plan
24
plan quality
24
quality
10
action
8
type diabetes
8
primary care
8
action planning
8
health literacy
8
social risks
8
plan
7

Similar Publications