A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Bone grafting and biologics for spinal fusion in the pediatric population: current understanding and future perspective. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Pediatric spinal fusions have been associated with nonunion rates of approximately 25%, putting patients at risk for neurological complications while simultaneously incurring significant costs for revision surgery. In an effort to decrease nonunion rates, various bone grafts and biologics have been developed to increase osseous formation and arthrosis. The current gold-standard bone graft is autologous bone taken from the iliac crest or ribs, but this procedure is associated with significant morbidity and postoperative pain due to an additional graft harvesting procedure. Other bone graft substitutes and biologics include allografts, demineralized bone matrix, bone morphogenetic protein, and bioactive glass. Ultimately, these substitutes have been studied more extensively in the adult population, and there is a paucity of strong evidence for the use of these agents within the pediatric population. In this review, the authors will discuss in detail the characteristics of the various bone graft substitutes, their fusion efficacy, and their safety profile in this subpopulation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2021.3.FOCUS2148DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone graft
12
bone
8
pediatric population
8
nonunion rates
8
graft substitutes
8
bone grafting
4
grafting biologics
4
biologics spinal
4
spinal fusion
4
fusion pediatric
4

Similar Publications