A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Structure-based QSAR Models to Predict Repeat Dose Toxicity Points of Departure. | LitMetric

Structure-based QSAR Models to Predict Repeat Dose Toxicity Points of Departure.

Comput Toxicol

Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Published: November 2020


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Human health risk assessment for environmental chemical exposure is limited by a vast majority of chemicals with little or no experimental toxicity data. Data gap filling techniques, such as quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models based on chemical structure information, can predict hazard in the absence of experimental data. Risk assessment requires identification of a quantitative point-of-departure (POD) value, the point on the dose-response curve that marks the beginning of a low-dose extrapolation. This study presents two sets of QSAR models to predict POD values (POD) for repeat dose toxicity. For training and validation, a publicly available toxicity dataset for 3592 chemicals was compiled using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxicity Value database (ToxValDB). The first set of QSAR models predict point-estimates of POD values (POD) using structural and physicochemical descriptors for repeat dose study types and species combinations. A random forest QSAR model using study type and species as descriptors showed the best performance, with an external test set root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.71 log-mg/kg/day and coefficient of determination (R) of 0.53. The second set of QSAR models predict the 95% confidence intervals for POD using a constructed POD distribution with a mean equal to the median POD value and a standard deviation of 0.5 log-mg/kg/day, based on previously published typical study-to-study variability that may lead to uncertainty in model predictions. Bootstrap resampling of the pre-generated POD distribution was used to derive point-estimates and 95% confidence intervals for each POD prediction. Enrichment analysis to evaluate the accuracy of POD showed that 80% of the 5% most potent chemicals were found in the top 20% of the most potent chemical predictions, suggesting that the repeat dose POD QSAR models presented here may help inform screening level human health risk assessments in the absence of other data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8128699PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100139DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qsar models
24
models predict
16
repeat dose
16
pod
12
dose toxicity
8
human health
8
health risk
8
risk assessment
8
pod values
8
values pod
8

Similar Publications