Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Risk stratification in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) requires reliable diagnostic tests, not only to identify high-grade PCa, also to minimize the overdetection of low-grade PCa, and reduction of "unnecessary" prostate MRIs and biopsies. This study aimed to evaluate the SelectMDx test to detect high-grade PCa in biopsy-naïve men. Subsequently, to assess combinations of SelectMDx test and multi-parametric (mp) MRI and its potential impact on patient selection for prostate biopsy.

Methods: This prospective multicenter diagnostic study included 599 biopsy-naïve patients with prostate-specific antigen level ≥3 ng/ml. All patients underwent a SelectMDx test and mpMRI before systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUSGB). Patients with a suspicious mpMRI also had an in-bore MR-guided biopsy (MRGB). Histopathologic outcome of TRUSGB and MRGB was used as reference standard. High-grade PCa was defined as ISUP Grade Group (GG) ≥ 2. The primary outcome was the detection rates of low- and high-grade PCa and number of biopsies avoided in four strategies, i.e., (1) SelectMDx test-only, (2) mpMRI-only, (3) SelectMDx test followed by mpMRI when SelectMDx test was positive (conditional strategy), and (4) SelectMDx test and mpMRI in all (joint strategy). A positive SelectMDx test outcome was a risk score of ≥-2.8. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess clinical utility.

Results: Prevalence of high-grade PCa was 31% (183/599). Thirty-eight percent (227/599) of patients had negative SelectMDx test in whom biopsy could be avoided. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 35% (48/138) with missing 10% (18/183) high-grade PCa. Yet, mpMRI-only could avoid 49% of biopsies, not detecting 4.9% (9/183) of high-grade PCa. The conditional strategy reduces the number of mpMRIs by 38% (227/599), avoiding biopsy in 60% (357/599) and missing 13% (24/183) high-grade PCa. Low-grade PCa was not detected in 58% (80/138). DCA showed the highest net benefit for the mpMRI-only strategy, followed by the conditional strategy at-risk thresholds >10%.

Conclusions: SelectMDx test as a risk stratification tool for biopsy-naïve men avoids unnecessary biopsies in 38%, minimizes low-grade PCa detection, and misses only 10% high-grade PCa. Yet, using mpMRI in all patients had the highest net benefit, avoiding biopsy in 49% and missing 4.9% of high-risk PCa. However, if mpMRI availability is limited or expensive, using mpMRI-only in SelectMDx test positive patients is a good alternative strategy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616754PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00367-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

selectmdx test
40
high-grade pca
36
test mpmri
16
low-grade pca
16
pca
15
biopsy-naïve men
12
conditional strategy
12
test
11
selectmdx
11
high-grade
9

Similar Publications

Prostate cancer is a major global health concern, and current diagnostic methods, including prostate-specific antigen testing, have significant limitations. SelectMDx is a urinary biomarker test used for risk stratification of clinically significant prostate cancer, with the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies. This retrospective study included 126 patients evaluated in a Romanian university hospital between January 2022 and December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of the SelectMDx urinary biomarker test in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions identified through multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), a subgroup in which prostate cancer diagnosis remains uncertain. The primary objective was to assess whether SelectMDx can improve risk stratification for clinically significant prostate cancer and thereby reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Materials And Methods: A prospective cohort of 40 patients with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≥3 ng/mL and PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions on mpMRI was analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Despite improving diagnostic possibilities, the incidence of prostate cancer is increasing, but we are not able to reduce the mortality rate. While PSA, 4K score, PCA3 and other urinary markers, ExoDX, SelectMDX, Confirm MDx or MiPS tests are used to identify potential prostate cancer carriers, Decipher, Prolaris or Oncotype DX tests are used to assess the aggressiveness of proven cancer in order to stratify patients for early or delayed treatment. More modern forms of treatment for advanced disease include second-generation antiandrogens and PARP inhibitors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening primarily relies on Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), which has low specificity and therefore leads to unnecessary biopsies. Consequently, there is a growing need for, ideally, non-invasive biomarkers. Liquid biopsy, a diagnostic approach analyzing circulating tumor components in body fluids, has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool for various cancers, including PCa.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recognizing the limitations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and the morbidity of prostate biopsies, several blood- and urine-based biomarkers have been proposed for pre-biopsy risk stratification. These assays aim to reduce the frequency of unnecessary biopsies (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF