98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Achieving rigid spinal fixation can be challenging in patients with cancer-related instability, as factors such as osteopenia, radiation, and immunosuppression adversely affect bone quality. Augmenting pedicle screws with cement is a strategy to overcome construct failure. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of cement augmentation with fenestrated pedicle screws in patients undergoing posterior, open thoracolumbar surgery for spinal metastases.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent surgery for cancer-related spine instability from 2016 to 2019 at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Patient demographics, surgical details, radiographic characteristics, patterns of cement extravasation, complications, and prospectively collected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference and Pain Intensity scores were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with cement extravasation.
Results: Sixty-nine patients underwent open posterior surgery with a total of 502 cement-augmented screws (mean 7.8 screws per construct). The median follow-up period for those who survived past 90 days was 25.3 months (IQR 10.8-34.6 months). Thirteen patients (18.8%) either died within 90 days or were lost to follow-up. Postoperative CT was performed to assess the instrumentation and patterns of cement extravasation. There was no screw loosening, pullout, or failure. The rate of cement extravasation was 28.9% (145/502), most commonly through the segmental veins (77/145, 53.1%). Screws breaching the lateral border of the pedicle but with fenestrations within the vertebral body were associated with a higher risk of leakage through the segmental veins compared with screws without any breach (OR 8.77, 95% CI 2.84-29.79; p < 0.001). Cement extravasation did not cause symptoms except in 1 patient who developed a symptomatic thoracic radiculopathy requiring decompression. There was 1 case of asymptomatic pulmonary cement embolism. Patients experienced significant pain improvement at the 3-month follow-up, with decreases in Pain Interference (mean change 15.8, 95% CI 14.5-17.1; p < 0.001) and Pain Intensity (mean change 28.5, 95% CI 26.7-30.4; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Cement augmentation through fenestrated pedicle screws is a safe and effective option for spine stabilization in the cancer population. The risk of clinically significant adverse events from cement extravasation is very low.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2021.2.FOCUS201121 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
July 2025
Department of Cardiology, Beirut Cardiac Institute, Beirut, LBN.
This case report presents a 70-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with an intracardiac cement embolism two months after a percutaneous vertebroplasty of her L4 vertebra. Although percutaneous vertebroplasty is generally considered a safe procedure, this case highlights the potential for serious complications. The patient was on oral vitamin K antagonist for the past 20 years for an unprovoked deep vein thrombosis and on statins for a chronic dyslipidemia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSpine (Phila Pa 1976)
July 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Study Design: Biomechanical/basic science.
Objective: To evaluate efficacy of dental cement augmentation of lateral mass screws in the cervical spine.
Summary Of Background Data: Premature loosening and fixation failure is a known problem of screw fixation of the spine, especially in cases of poor bone quality.
Pain Pract
July 2025
Department of Pain Medicine, The University of MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Radiol Case Rep
September 2025
Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Image-guided vertebral augmentation effectively treats pathologic vertebral lesions, though managing pathology in the cervical spine presents unique challenges. Posterolateral approaches, while safer, require prone positioning that may not be feasible for all patients. Open anterolateral and transoral approaches increase infection risk and typically require general anesthesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlobal Spine J
May 2025
Department of Traumatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThe SpineJack®-system represents a new generation of kyphoplasty for the treatment of traumatic and osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the usage, safety and efficacy of the SpineJack®-system, in both osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF