98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Lung cancer screening (LCS) efficacy is highly dependent on adherence to annual screening, but little is known about real-world adherence determinants. We used insurance claims data to examine associations between LCS annual adherence and demographic, comorbidity, health care usage, and geographic factors.
Materials And Methods: Insurance claims data for all individuals with an LCS low-dose CT scan were obtained from the Colorado All Payer Claims Dataset. Adherence was defined as a second claim for a screening CT 10 to 18 months after the index claim. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to define the relationship between annual adherence and age, gender, insurance type, residence location, outpatient health care usage, and comorbidity burden.
Results: After exclusions, the final data set consisted of 9,056 records with 3,072 adherent, 3,570 nonadherent, and 2,414 censored (unclassifiable) individuals. Less adherence was associated with ages 55 to 59 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-0.94), 60 to 64 (HR = 0.83, 99% CI = 0.71-0.97), and 75 to 79 (HR = 0.79, 99% CI = 0.65-0.97); rural residence (HR = 0.56, 99% CI = 0.43-0.73); Medicare fee-for-service (HR = 0.45, 99% CI = 0.39-0.51), and Medicaid (HR = 0.50, 99% CI = 0.40-0.62). A significant interaction between outpatient health care usage and comorbidity was also observed. Increased outpatient usage was associated with increased adherence and was most pronounced for individuals without comorbidities.
Conclusions: This population-based description of LCS adherence determinants provides insight into populations that might benefit from specific interventions targeted toward improving adherence and maximizing LCS benefit. Quantifying population-based adherence rates and understanding factors associated with annual adherence are critical to improving screening adherence and reducing lung cancer death.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8349785 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.03.003 | DOI Listing |
J Vasc Surg
August 2022
Department of Vascular Surgery, Miller Family Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address:
Objective: The natural history of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) has not been well-studied. The optimal size threshold for elective repair of isolated CIAAs is also not well-defined. We sought to determine the natural history and growth rates of isolated CIAAs to justify a surveillance protocol and size for elective repair.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Angiol
June 2017
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Vasc Surg
April 2012
Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill, USA.
Introduction: A significant proportion of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) have common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA). Aneurysmal involvement at the iliac bifurcation potentially undermines long-term durability.
Methods: Patients with CIAA who underwent EVAR were identified in two teaching hospitals.
J Vasc Surg
June 2008
Division of Vascular Surgery, Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Objectives: To assess expansion rate of common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) and define outcomes after open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVAR).
Methods: Clinical data of 438 patients with 715 CIAAs treated between 1986 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Size, presentations, treatments, and outcomes were recorded.