A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Therapeutic effect of intense pulsed light with optimal pulse technology on meibomian gland dysfunction with and without ocular infestation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy with optimal pulse technology (OPT) on meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) with and without ocular infestation.

Methods: This prospective study included 150 patients with MGD who were divided into -infested (DI) and non-infested (control) groups according to counts determined by epilating eyelashes to evaluate. Each patient underwent three OPT treatment sessions at 3-week intervals. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), counts, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score, conjunctival congestion, tear meniscus height (TMH), tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer I test (SIT), corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining scores, meibomian gland (MG) macrostructure, lid margin abnormality, MG expressibility, and meibum quality were assessed before the first treatment as baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months (M1, M2 and M3, respectively) after treatment.

Results: The incidence of infestation was 59.15% (84/142) at baseline and the final eradication rate at M3 was 83.3% (70/84). Corneal staining and conjunctival congestion showed slower improvement in the DI group than in the control group at M1 and M2 (P<0.05), but was significantly improved at M3 than that at with baseline (P<0.01). Both the groups showed significant improvement in OSDI, conjunctival congestion, TBUT, corneal and conjunctival staining, MG dropout, lid margin abnormality, MG expressibility, and meibum quality at M3 (P<0.05). No differences were observed for BCVA, IOP, SIT, and TMH before and after treatment in both the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions: This new-generation IPL with OPT treatment results in greater improvement in MG expressibility and meibum quality in MGD patients with infestation than in those without, but not for corneal staining.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7940958PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1745DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meibomian gland
12
therapeutic intense
8
intense pulsed
8
pulsed light
8
optimal pulse
8
pulse technology
8
gland dysfunction
8
conjunctival congestion
8
light optimal
4
technology meibomian
4

Similar Publications