98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: In extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC), response rates to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are robust, but responses lack durability. CheckMate 451, a double-blind phase III trial, evaluated nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy for ED-SCLC.
Methods: Patients with ED-SCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, and no progression after ≤ 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 12 weeks followed by nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo for ≤ 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. Secondary end points were hierarchically tested.
Results: Overall, 834 patients were randomly assigned. The minimum follow-up was 8.9 months. OS was not significantly prolonged with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.12; = .37; median, 9.2 9.6 months). The HR for OS with nivolumab versus placebo was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69 to 1.02); the median OS for nivolumab was 10.4 months. Progression-free survival HRs versus placebo were 0.72 for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87) and 0.67 for nivolumab (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). A trend toward OS benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in patients with tumor mutational burden ≥ 13 mutations per megabase. Rates of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were nivolumab plus ipilimumab (52.2%), nivolumab (11.5%), and placebo (8.4%).
Conclusion: Maintenance therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not prolong OS for patients with ED-SCLC who did not progress on first-line chemotherapy. There were no new safety signals.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078251 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02212 | DOI Listing |
Int J Clin Oncol
September 2025
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-19-18, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 105-8471, Japan.
Background: Despite durable benefits of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), early progressive disease (PD), defined as disease progression within 3 months, occurs, and its predictors remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the clinical factors associated with early PD in patients with mRCC treated with this regimen.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional database identified 193 patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab.
Background: Patients with BRAF wild type (wt) metastatic melanoma who exhibit primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) face a poor prognosis. Chemotherapy has been shown to induce genetic mutations, modify the tumor microenvironment and microbiome, and influence immune system activity.
Objectives: This prospective multicenter phase II trial investigates whether two applications of an alkylating agent (dacarbazine/DTIC) can sensitize ICI non-responsive patients with metastatic melanoma to the same checkpoint inhibitor regime.
Front Oncol
August 2025
Department of Chemotherapy, The District Hospital, Sucha Beskidzka, Poland.
Background: Nivolumab and ipilimumab (nivo+ipi) are recommended for treating metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), though their safety and efficacy in older adults remain uncertain. This study examines the outcomes of this regimen in Polish patients aged ≥65 years.
Methods: In this multicenter observational study, 138 patients with mRCC who received nivo+ipi between May 2022 and October 2024 were analyzed.
Int J Cancer
September 2025
Department of Peritoneal Oncology, Cancer Center of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital & School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
To investigate the efficacy of postoperative immunotherapy in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The clinical data of 160 MPM patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC at our center from April 2015 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received postoperative chemotherapy and were divided into the Chemo-only group and the Immunotherapy group according to whether they received postoperative immunotherapy or not.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnticancer Res
September 2025
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan;
Background: The optimal treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49% remains unknown. Further stratification by PD-L1 TPS may lead to optimization of treatment.
Patients And Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to compare nivolumab and ipilimumab with/without chemotherapy (dual-therapy group) and chemotherapy with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (single-therapy group) as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%.