Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Despite the challenges to the HIV response in the Asia-Pacific, a demedicalisation of HIV intervention has been demonstrated to be an important strategy to maximise the uptake of HIV prevention tools among key populations in this region. Demedicalisation of HIV interventions translates medical discourse and shifts the paradigm from a disease-focused to a people-centred approach. It also recognises real-life experiences of key populations in the HIV response by empowering them to voice their needs and be at the forefront of the epidemic control. We further categorise a demedicalisation approach into three frameworks: (1) the demystification of clinical or medical concerns; (2) the destigmatisation of people living with HIV; and (3) the decentralisation of healthcare services. This article reviewed the demedicalisation framework by looking at the HIV intervention examples from countries in the Asia-Pacific, which included: (1) a study on drug-drug interaction between pre-exposure prophylaxis and feminising hormone treatment for transgender women; (2) the roles of key population-led health services; and (3) certification of key population lay providers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH20172DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

demedicalisation hiv
12
hiv interventions
8
hiv
8
hiv response
8
hiv intervention
8
key populations
8
demedicalisation
5
interventions hiv
4
hiv asia-pacific
4
asia-pacific despite
4

Similar Publications

Conventional HIV testing performed by a health professional has shown its limitations in targeting marginalized and vulnerable populations. Indeed, men who have sex with men (MSM) due to social discrimination are often uncomfortable using this service at the health facilities level. In this perspective, new differentiated approaches have been thought through de-medicalized and decentralized HIV testing (DDHT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Thailand National AIDS Committee endorsed Undetectable=Untransmittable (U=U) as a science which needs an urgent translation into actions to address pervasive stigma faced by people living with HIV (PLHIV). We aimed at humanising and demedicalising U=U by exploring a 'people-centered value' of U=U and translate them into efficient U=U communications.

Methods: During August-September 2022, in-depth interviews were conducted with 43 PLHIV and 17 partners from various background in five regions of Thailand.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

More than a decade after the first efficacy evidence for oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was reported, PrEP uptake globally has been inadequate and global HIV prevention targets have been missed. Access to PrEP is still highly concentrated in a fairly small number of countries and, even within countries with widespread PrEP access, inequalities have emerged. More ambitious, high-priority global targets for PrEP uptake are required and could accelerate the HIV prevention response in a similar way to the success of the 90-90-90 testing and treatment targets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Despite the challenges to the HIV response in the Asia-Pacific, a demedicalisation of HIV intervention has been demonstrated to be an important strategy to maximise the uptake of HIV prevention tools among key populations in this region. Demedicalisation of HIV interventions translates medical discourse and shifts the paradigm from a disease-focused to a people-centred approach. It also recognises real-life experiences of key populations in the HIV response by empowering them to voice their needs and be at the forefront of the epidemic control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

On remedicalisation: male circumcision in the United States and Great Britain.

Sociol Health Illn

May 2010

Department of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

This paper compares the histories of male circumcision in the United States and Great Britain to explicate the theoretically important, yet inadequately specified, processes of demedicalisation and remedicalisation. Circumcision became medicalised to a similar extent, through similar processes, in both countries before World War II. However, by the 1960s, circumcision was almost completely demedicalised in Britain and almost universal in the US, where it became partially demedicalised after the 1970s.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF