98%
921
2 minutes
20
Purpose: To compare the differences in preoperative pathology, surgical technique, and overall outcomes between patients treated surgically after a single anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation and those undergoing surgery after multiple dislocations.
Methods: An epidemiologic database was used to identify all patients younger than 40 years undergoing surgery for anterior shoulder instability between January 1, 1994, and July 31, 2016, in a defined geographic area. Patient medical records were reviewed to obtain demographic information, patient history, physical examination findings, imaging findings, clinical progression, surgical details, and outcomes. Comparative analysis was performed between patients who underwent surgery after a single dislocation and those who underwent surgery after multiple preoperative dislocations.
Results: The study population consisted of 187 patients who had a single anterior shoulder dislocation (n = 55) or multiple anterior shoulder dislocations (n = 132) prior to surgery. The mean follow-up period was 103.3 months (range, 0.3-328.4 months). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different between groups. Although the presence of Hill-Sachs lesions on radiographs was more common in the multiple-dislocation group (42.1%) than in the single-dislocation group (18.8%, = .005), there were no other significant differences in concomitant pathology between groups. Latarjet procedures were more commonly performed in the multiple-dislocation group (12.5% vs 2.1% in the single-dislocation group, = .04). There were no other significant differences in surgical techniques and characteristics between groups. Rates of survival free from recurrent instability ( = .790), revision surgery ( = .726), and progression to symptomatic osteoarthritis ( = .588) were not significantly different between groups.
Conclusions: Although patients with multiple dislocations prior to surgery were more likely to show radiographic evidence of Hill-Sachs lesions and undergo the Latarjet procedure than those who received surgery after a single dislocation, no significant differences in outcomes with respect to recurrent instability, revision surgery, or progression to symptomatic osteoarthritis were found between these 2 groups at long-term follow-up.
Level Of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7879183 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2020.09.006 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Jupiter Hospital, Thāne, India.
We aim to describe an approach for reducing the posteriorly dislocated humeral head through the rotator interval via a deltopectoral approach that is frequently utilized for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures and fracture dislocations. The sheath of the long head of biceps (LHB) and the rotator interval capsule are opened till the glenoid; this enables access to the glenohumeral joint via the rotator interval. A long-handle Cobb elevator is introduced through the rotator interval and, under intraoperative imaging, advanced posteromedially to the dislocated humeral head.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFA 2-year minimum follow-up period has generally been preferred in orthopaedic studies. This minimum standard aids comparisons across the literature and helps to ensure methodological rigor. However, in some situations these minimum durations are not required to answer specific research questions and strictly enforcing these requirements poses unnecessary barriers to research by adding cost and complexity, increasing the risk of loss to follow-up, and potentially restricting early dissemination of clinically important findings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Orthop Relat Res
September 2025
Consultant Shoulder Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedics, Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
September 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeosu Baek Hospital, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between open and arthroscopic anterior latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer techniques for treating irreparable subscapularis (SSC) tears.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent open or arthroscopic anterior LD transfer for irreparable SSC tears between February 2014 and August 2020. Patients were included if they had irreparable SSC tears with Lafosse Grade 4 or higher and Goutallier Grade 3 or higher, but without advanced arthritis (Hamada Grade < 3).
J ISAKOS
September 2025
McMaster University Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oakville, ON, Canada.
Introduction/objectives: Irreparable subscapularis tears can cause severe functional impairment and present significant clinical challenges. Current treatment options include tendon transfers (TTs), anterior capsular reconstruction, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Each approach has distinct biomechanical advantages and limitations, but there remains no consensus regarding the optimal treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF